Tools & Wizards About Us
choice1staffing.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

choice1staffing.com

Pittsburgh Staffing Agency, Staffing Services| 724-468-6400

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

229 ms

Resources Loaded

797 ms

Page Rendered

135 ms

choice1staffing.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to choice1staffing.com homepage info - get ready to check Choice1 Staffing best content right away, or after learning these important things about choice1staffing.com

Choice One Staffing Group, Administrative, Light Industrial, Technical, Medical and Hospitality Staffing

Visit choice1staffing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Choice1staffing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 229 ms and then it took 932 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

choice1staffing.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value570 ms

52/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.077

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.7 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

choice1staffing.com

229 ms

choice1staffing.com

74 ms

js

73 ms

style.min.css

33 ms

settings.css

52 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Choice1staffing.com, 10% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (308 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 131.0 kB (4%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Choice1staffing.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 129.6 kB

  • Original 159.3 kB
  • After minification 157.7 kB
  • After compression 29.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 129.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 2.8 MB
  • After minification 2.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Choice1 Staffing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 76 B

  • Original 2.6 kB
  • After minification 2.6 kB
  • After compression 2.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (71%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Choice1 Staffing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

choice1staffing.com

choice1staffing.com

229 ms

choice1staffing.com

choice1staffing.com

74 ms

js

js

73 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

33 ms

settings.css

settings.css

52 ms

fontello.css

fontello.css

54 ms

job-listings.css

job-listings.css

55 ms

pagenavi-css.css

pagenavi-css.css

45 ms

be.css

be.css

87 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

67 ms

fontawesome.css

fontawesome.css

85 ms

jplayer.blue.monday.min.css

jplayer.blue.monday.min.css

111 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

107 ms

css

css

41 ms

style.css

style.css

79 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

106 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

123 ms

css

css

52 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

121 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

172 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

171 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

172 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

174 ms

debouncedresize.min.js

debouncedresize.min.js

175 ms

magnificpopup.min.js

magnificpopup.min.js

175 ms

menu.js

menu.js

178 ms

visible.min.js

visible.min.js

179 ms

animations.min.js

animations.min.js

178 ms

jplayer.min.js

jplayer.min.js

181 ms

enllax.min.js

enllax.min.js

217 ms

translate3d.js

translate3d.js

217 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

218 ms

esg.min.js

esg.min.js

221 ms

embed

embed

308 ms

choice-1-staffing-pittsburgh-1.png

choice-1-staffing-pittsburgh-1.png

81 ms

box_shadow.png

box_shadow.png

100 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

61 ms

administrative.jpg

administrative.jpg

100 ms

light-industrial.jpg

light-industrial.jpg

80 ms

technical.jpg

technical.jpg

112 ms

medical.jpg

medical.jpg

110 ms

hospitality.jpg

hospitality.jpg

111 ms

subheader-bg.jpg

subheader-bg.jpg

100 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

81 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

94 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

100 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

60 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

57 ms

icons.woff

icons.woff

106 ms

js

js

35 ms

Accessibility Review

choice1staffing.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

choice1staffing.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

choice1staffing.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Choice1staffing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Choice1staffing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

choice1staffing.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Choice1 Staffing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: