Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

choiceblinds.co.uk

Choice Blinds UK | Quality Blinds in Sutton Coldfield, Birmingham

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

637 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

232 ms

choiceblinds.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Choice Blinds content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about choiceblinds.co.uk

Choice Blinds UK. Sutton Coldfield's first choice for quality blinds. We stock and install everything you need to keep your windows looking great. From roller blinds, Venetian and Vertical. We pride o...

Visit choiceblinds.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Choiceblinds.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 637 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

choiceblinds.co.uk performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.6 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,550 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.107

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

choiceblinds.co.uk

637 ms

www.choiceblinds.co.uk

528 ms

addthis_widget.js

50 ms

js

111 ms

bootstrap.min.css

267 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Choiceblinds.co.uk, 12% (3 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (764 ms) belongs to the original domain Choiceblinds.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (27%)

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

3.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Choiceblinds.co.uk main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 14.8 kB

  • Original 19.4 kB
  • After minification 15.6 kB
  • After compression 4.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.8 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

  • Original 3.9 MB
  • After minification 2.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Choice Blinds needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 13.6 kB

  • Original 155.5 kB
  • After minification 155.5 kB
  • After compression 142.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 118.8 kB

  • Original 144.6 kB
  • After minification 144.1 kB
  • After compression 25.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Choiceblinds.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 118.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (57%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Choice Blinds. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

choiceblinds.co.uk accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

choiceblinds.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

choiceblinds.co.uk SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Choiceblinds.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Choiceblinds.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Choice Blinds. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: