Tools & Wizards About Us
choiceinc.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

choiceinc.com

Mobile App Design, Development Santa Clarita | ChoiceInc

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

611 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

421 ms

choiceinc.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to choiceinc.com homepage info - get ready to check Choice Inc best content right away, or after learning these important things about choiceinc.com

Looking for Mobile App Development, Mobile App Design in Santa Clarita? Website Design, Website Development, Healthcare Mobile apps allow professionals to access medical data easily.

Visit choiceinc.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Choiceinc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 611 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

choiceinc.com performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

17/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

77/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

74/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.048

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.7 s

46/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

choiceinc.com

611 ms

143 ms

bootstrap.css

203 ms

font-awesome.css

194 ms

fonts.css

141 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Choiceinc.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ua.siteground.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (939 ms) belongs to the original domain Choiceinc.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (53%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Choiceinc.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 31.6 kB

  • Original 36.9 kB
  • After minification 25.0 kB
  • After compression 5.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.9 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 1.6 MB

  • Original 3.0 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Choice Inc needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.6 MB or 54% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 22.5 kB

  • Original 95.0 kB
  • After minification 94.7 kB
  • After compression 72.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 22.5 kB or 24% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 16.3 kB

  • Original 46.2 kB
  • After minification 46.2 kB
  • After compression 29.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Choiceinc.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.3 kB or 35% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (24%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

50

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Choice Inc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

choiceinc.com

choiceinc.com

611 ms

143 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

203 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

194 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

141 ms

ekko-lightbox.css

ekko-lightbox.css

131 ms

animation.css

animation.css

151 ms

style.css

style.css

197 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

401 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

282 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

225 ms

ekko-lightbox.js

ekko-lightbox.js

238 ms

easing.js

easing.js

238 ms

jquery.ui.totop.js

jquery.ui.totop.js

233 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

318 ms

animate-waypoints.js

animate-waypoints.js

346 ms

jquery-animation.js

jquery-animation.js

344 ms

jquery-animate-css-rotate-scale.js

jquery-animate-css-rotate-scale.js

343 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

11 ms

125x125.gif

125x125.gif

183 ms

logo.png

logo.png

190 ms

spacer.png

spacer.png

299 ms

banner-bg1.jpg

banner-bg1.jpg

354 ms

banner-img1.png

banner-img1.png

583 ms

banner-bg4.jpg

banner-bg4.jpg

355 ms

banner-img4.png

banner-img4.png

379 ms

banner-bg2.jpg

banner-bg2.jpg

370 ms

banner-img2.png

banner-img2.png

484 ms

banner-bg5.jpg

banner-bg5.jpg

579 ms

banner-img5.png

banner-img5.png

490 ms

banner-bg3.jpg

banner-bg3.jpg

675 ms

banner-img3.png

banner-img3.png

509 ms

banner-bg6.jpg

banner-bg6.jpg

609 ms

banner-img6.png

banner-img6.png

699 ms

left.png

left.png

581 ms

right.png

right.png

677 ms

service-icon1.png

service-icon1.png

675 ms

service-icon2.png

service-icon2.png

669 ms

service-icon3.png

service-icon3.png

692 ms

service-icon4.png

service-icon4.png

752 ms

service-icon5.png

service-icon5.png

753 ms

service-icon6.png

service-icon6.png

753 ms

explore-img.png

explore-img.png

870 ms

mobile-media-bg.jpg

mobile-media-bg.jpg

820 ms

mobile-media-img.png

mobile-media-img.png

773 ms

application-development.png

application-development.png

939 ms

collect

collect

28 ms

TCM.TTF

TCM.TTF

764 ms

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

765 ms

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

770 ms

OpenSans-Bold-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Bold-webfont.woff

846 ms

js

js

67 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

801 ms

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

761 ms

125x125.gif

125x125.gif

172 ms

prient-media-bg.jpg

prient-media-bg.jpg

751 ms

prient-media-img.png

prient-media-img.png

816 ms

seo.jpg

seo.jpg

826 ms

Illustration-bg.jpg

Illustration-bg.jpg

831 ms

Illustration-img.png

Illustration-img.png

791 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

712 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

725 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

731 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

714 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

707 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

611 ms

sub-logo1.jpg

sub-logo1.jpg

686 ms

sub-logo2.jpg

sub-logo2.jpg

659 ms

sub-logo3.jpg

sub-logo3.jpg

597 ms

sub-logo4.jpg

sub-logo4.jpg

595 ms

sub-logo5.jpg

sub-logo5.jpg

594 ms

sub-logo6.jpg

sub-logo6.jpg

559 ms

sub-logo7.jpg

sub-logo7.jpg

585 ms

sub-logo8.jpg

sub-logo8.jpg

569 ms

ui.totop2.png

ui.totop2.png

589 ms

Accessibility Review

choiceinc.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

choiceinc.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

choiceinc.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Choiceinc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Choiceinc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

choiceinc.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Choice Inc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: