Tools & Wizards About Us
choicemetalbuildings.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

choicemetalbuildings.com

Metal Building Installation: Choice Metal Buildings, NC

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

169 ms

Resources Loaded

883 ms

Page Rendered

436 ms

choicemetalbuildings.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to choicemetalbuildings.com homepage info - get ready to check Choice Metal Buildings best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about choicemetalbuildings.com

Choice

Visit choicemetalbuildings.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Choicemetalbuildings.com page load time and found that the first response time was 169 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

choicemetalbuildings.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

30/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,200 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.023

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.0 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

choicemetalbuildings.com

169 ms

www.choicemetalbuildings.com

108 ms

gtm.js

109 ms

css

46 ms

autoptimize_d0495780fe0a93a4019cc37593da78ae.css

61 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Choicemetalbuildings.com, 23% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (319 ms) belongs to the original domain Choicemetalbuildings.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 103.9 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Choicemetalbuildings.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 510.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 53.0 kB

  • Original 68.4 kB
  • After minification 68.4 kB
  • After compression 15.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 503.1 kB
  • After minification 503.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Choice Metal Buildings images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 32.3 kB

  • Original 510.7 kB
  • After minification 510.7 kB
  • After compression 478.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 18.6 kB

  • Original 150.9 kB
  • After minification 150.9 kB
  • After compression 132.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Choicemetalbuildings.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.6 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (52%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Choice Metal Buildings. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

choicemetalbuildings.com

choicemetalbuildings.com

169 ms

www.choicemetalbuildings.com

www.choicemetalbuildings.com

108 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

109 ms

css

css

46 ms

autoptimize_d0495780fe0a93a4019cc37593da78ae.css

autoptimize_d0495780fe0a93a4019cc37593da78ae.css

61 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

104 ms

api.js

api.js

46 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

184 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

154 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

153 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

182 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

278 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

180 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

250 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

183 ms

autoptimize_f8ee70f49a80a614ca71146bf4199ebe.js

autoptimize_f8ee70f49a80a614ca71146bf4199ebe.js

319 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

101 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

130 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

183 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

183 ms

yMJMMIlzdpvBhQQL_SC3X9yhF25-T1nysimBoWg2.ttf

yMJMMIlzdpvBhQQL_SC3X9yhF25-T1nysimBoWg2.ttf

115 ms

yMJMMIlzdpvBhQQL_SC3X9yhF25-T1ny_CmBoWg2.ttf

yMJMMIlzdpvBhQQL_SC3X9yhF25-T1ny_CmBoWg2.ttf

115 ms

yMJMMIlzdpvBhQQL_SC3X9yhF25-T1nyKS6BoWg2.ttf

yMJMMIlzdpvBhQQL_SC3X9yhF25-T1nyKS6BoWg2.ttf

115 ms

yMJMMIlzdpvBhQQL_SC3X9yhF25-T1nyGy6BoWg2.ttf

yMJMMIlzdpvBhQQL_SC3X9yhF25-T1nyGy6BoWg2.ttf

115 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

91 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

72 ms

logo.png

logo.png

86 ms

carport.png

carport.png

99 ms

barn.png

barn.png

172 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

98 ms

Florida.png

Florida.png

144 ms

garage.png

garage.png

142 ms

front-page-resources-bg.jpg

front-page-resources-bg.jpg

73 ms

front-page-content-1-title-bg.jpg

front-page-content-1-title-bg.jpg

127 ms

choice-metal-buildings-metal-structures.jpg

choice-metal-buildings-metal-structures.jpg

95 ms

Accessibility Review

choicemetalbuildings.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

choicemetalbuildings.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

choicemetalbuildings.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Choicemetalbuildings.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Choicemetalbuildings.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

choicemetalbuildings.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Choice Metal Buildings. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: