Report Summary

  • 91

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

86 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

choicestream.com screenshot

About Website

Visit choicestream.com now to see the best up-to-date Choicestream content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about choicestream.com

programmatic, optimized. take your digital advertising to the next level with custom audiences, multi-algorithmic optimization, dynamic creative, cross-device tracking, and advanced insights

Visit choicestream.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Choicestream.com page load time and found that the first response time was 86 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Choicestream.com rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

choicestream.com performance score

91

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

79/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.029

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.9 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

choicestream.com

86 ms

www.choicestream.com

112 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

42 ms

styles.css

76 ms

style.css

81 ms

Our browser made a total of 178 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (135 requests) were addressed to the original Choicestream.com, 4% (7 requests) were made to Pollshare.com and 3% (6 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (443 ms) relates to the external source Staticxx.facebook.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 883.5 kB (25%)

Content Size

3.5 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Choicestream.com main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 31.9 kB

  • Original 40.0 kB
  • After minification 35.0 kB
  • After compression 8.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.0 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 190.2 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Choicestream images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 569.0 kB

  • Original 789.3 kB
  • After minification 628.3 kB
  • After compression 220.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 569.0 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 92.4 kB

  • Original 113.5 kB
  • After minification 100.4 kB
  • After compression 21.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Choicestream.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 92.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (28%)

Requests Now

165

After Optimization

118

The browser has sent 165 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Choicestream. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

choicestream.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

choicestream.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

choicestream.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Choicestream.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Choicestream.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Choicestream. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: