Tools & Wizards About Us
choicetg.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

choicetg.com

Managed IT Services & IT Support | Baltimore, MD | CTG

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

240 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

246 ms

choicetg.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Choicetg content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about choicetg.com

CTG provides IT consulting, computer support, network services, & more in Baltimore, Maryland. Serving Mid-Atlantic since 2005.

Visit choicetg.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Choicetg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 240 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

choicetg.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

26/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.9 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,580 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.298

40/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.5 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

choicetg.com

240 ms

www.choicetg.com

506 ms

style.css

26 ms

style.css

35 ms

custom.css

59 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 32% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Choicetg.com, 15% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 12% (9 requests) were made to Stcdn.leadconnectorhq.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (966 ms) relates to the external source Links.growably.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 261.2 kB (23%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

863.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Choicetg.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 661.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 93.8 kB

  • Original 129.7 kB
  • After minification 127.9 kB
  • After compression 35.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.8 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 22.6 kB

  • Original 134.7 kB
  • After minification 112.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Choicetg needs image optimization as it can save up to 22.6 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 99.1 kB

  • Original 661.3 kB
  • After minification 661.3 kB
  • After compression 562.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 99.1 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 45.7 kB

  • Original 199.0 kB
  • After minification 196.9 kB
  • After compression 153.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Choicetg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 45.7 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (79%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Choicetg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

choicetg.com

choicetg.com

240 ms

www.choicetg.com

www.choicetg.com

506 ms

style.css

style.css

26 ms

style.css

style.css

35 ms

custom.css

custom.css

59 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

43 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

69 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

68 ms

js

js

171 ms

plausible.js

plausible.js

115 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

83 ms

site.js

site.js

91 ms

vaxion.js

vaxion.js

149 ms

form_embed.js

form_embed.js

281 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

86 ms

chatstyleai.css

chatstyleai.css

157 ms

chatstyleai.js

chatstyleai.js

282 ms

swap.js

swap.js

112 ms

index.min.js

index.min.js

238 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

92 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

90 ms

superfish.min.js

superfish.min.js

99 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

108 ms

e887c3298b.js

e887c3298b.js

99 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

111 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

110 ms

jquery.metadata.min.js

jquery.metadata.min.js

111 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

111 ms

itr50c61it

itr50c61it

770 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

41 ms

css

css

62 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

67 ms

logo-r2-min.png

logo-r2-min.png

20 ms

mpJsEuUYyEkTgITcoUqc

mpJsEuUYyEkTgITcoUqc

966 ms

rsz_ctg_-_15_years1-216x300.png

rsz_ctg_-_15_years1-216x300.png

40 ms

owner-img-min1.png

owner-img-min1.png

44 ms

book-cover-img-min.png

book-cover-img-min.png

40 ms

srpthumb-p13330-50x50-no.jpg

srpthumb-p13330-50x50-no.jpg

376 ms

srpthumb-p13325-50x50-no.jpg

srpthumb-p13325-50x50-no.jpg

407 ms

styles.css

styles.css

21 ms

720997

720997

48 ms

settings-1726528352.json

settings-1726528352.json

105 ms

tRfnqClPD7uBzx2k25jS

tRfnqClPD7uBzx2k25jS

245 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

37 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

39 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

58 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

70 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

69 ms

in.php

in.php

208 ms

e887c3298b.css

e887c3298b.css

88 ms

font-awesome-css.min.css

font-awesome-css.min.css

14 ms

regular.css

regular.css

27 ms

solid.css

solid.css

26 ms

brands.css

brands.css

39 ms

iframeResizer.contentWindow.min.js

iframeResizer.contentWindow.min.js

26 ms

pixel.js

pixel.js

28 ms

css

css

25 ms

css

css

37 ms

FormComponent.f054a818.css

FormComponent.f054a818.css

48 ms

vue-multiselect.eb3eab67.css

vue-multiselect.eb3eab67.css

70 ms

app.5efdd9e1.css

app.5efdd9e1.css

72 ms

TextElement.0b941f97.css

TextElement.0b941f97.css

75 ms

TextBoxListElement.b602ad61.css

TextBoxListElement.b602ad61.css

73 ms

TextAreaElement.0c70ddc9.css

TextAreaElement.0c70ddc9.css

76 ms

OptionElement.05aaf420.css

OptionElement.05aaf420.css

70 ms

authorizeNet.5697a33e.css

authorizeNet.5697a33e.css

86 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

428 ms

check-circle.c2914d05.svg

check-circle.c2914d05.svg

18 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

4 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

12 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

7 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzcXKMny.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzcXKMny.ttf

8 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

13 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

12 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

22 ms

Accessibility Review

choicetg.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

choicetg.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

choicetg.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Choicetg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Choicetg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

choicetg.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Choicetg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: