Tools & Wizards About Us
choicewd.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

choicewd.com

Full-Service Home Remodeling & Improvement Contractors

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

101 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

511 ms

choicewd.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Choicewd content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about choicewd.com

No matter if you need a complete home remodel, small renovation, or help designing a new kitchen, Choice Home Remodeling is the team to call. Get a free quote from our contractors today!

Visit choicewd.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Choicewd.com page load time and found that the first response time was 101 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

choicewd.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,530 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.3 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

choicewd.com

101 ms

www.choicehomeremodeling.com

496 ms

js

69 ms

gtm.js

285 ms

js

286 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Choicewd.com, 53% (36 requests) were made to Choicehomeremodeling.com and 19% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Choicehomeremodeling.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (59%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Choicewd.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 1.7 MB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB
  • After compression 358.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.7 MB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 13.2 kB

  • Original 611.8 kB
  • After minification 598.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Choicewd images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 69.0 kB

  • Original 343.7 kB
  • After minification 343.7 kB
  • After compression 274.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 69.0 kB or 20% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (79%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Choicewd. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

choicewd.com

choicewd.com

101 ms

www.choicehomeremodeling.com

www.choicehomeremodeling.com

496 ms

js

js

69 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

285 ms

js

js

286 ms

hotjar-932193.js

hotjar-932193.js

112 ms

css2

css2

130 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

60 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

94 ms

jquery.image_mapper.js

jquery.image_mapper.js

98 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

97 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.js

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.js

119 ms

rollover.js

rollover.js

100 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

101 ms

61931.js

61931.js

68 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

68 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

145 ms

691870c25a.js

691870c25a.js

91 ms

jquery.matchHeight.js

jquery.matchHeight.js

144 ms

lightslider.min.js

lightslider.min.js

145 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

149 ms

masonry.js

masonry.js

149 ms

main.js

main.js

220 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

220 ms

app.build.js

app.build.js

250 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

250 ms

effect.min.js

effect.min.js

255 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

258 ms

wpls-public.js

wpls-public.js

264 ms

public-main.js

public-main.js

332 ms

public-swiper.min.js

public-swiper.min.js

395 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

83 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

444 ms

loader.js

loader.js

143 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

211 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

211 ms

marble-background.png

marble-background.png

607 ms

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjQXMI.woff

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjQXMI.woff

201 ms

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_ArQXMI.woff

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_ArQXMI.woff

203 ms

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_GbQXMI.woff

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_GbQXMI.woff

285 ms

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_LjQXMI.woff

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_LjQXMI.woff

314 ms

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjRXMI.woff

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjRXMI.woff

314 ms

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_ObXXMI.woff

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_ObXXMI.woff

315 ms

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_N_XXMI.woff

Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_N_XXMI.woff

316 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4k.woff

318 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff

318 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0C4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0C4k.woff

321 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff

322 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4k.woff

321 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4k.woff

321 ms

fa-light-300.woff

fa-light-300.woff

313 ms

fa-light-300.ttf

fa-light-300.ttf

282 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

311 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

407 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

313 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

440 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

441 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

440 ms

fa-thin-100.ttf

fa-thin-100.ttf

1105 ms

choice-windows-logo.png

choice-windows-logo.png

393 ms

bathroom-remodeling-company-1920x830.jpg

bathroom-remodeling-company-1920x830.jpg

469 ms

260 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

412 ms

call-tracking_9.js

call-tracking_9.js

128 ms

collect

collect

212 ms

wcm

wcm

64 ms

home-remodeling-in-lancaster-1920x830.jpg

home-remodeling-in-lancaster-1920x830.jpg

214 ms

91 ms

Accessibility Review

choicewd.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

choicewd.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

choicewd.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Choicewd.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Choicewd.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

choicewd.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Choicewd. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: