7.2 sec in total
336 ms
6.1 sec
742 ms
Visit choise.com now to see the best up-to-date Choise content for Venezuela and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about choise.com
Almost one million users take advantage of Choise.com to buy crypto, earn interest on their holdings, or boost their income with attractive earn products and ultimate security.
Visit choise.comWe analyzed Choise.com page load time and found that the first response time was 336 ms and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
choise.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value4.7 s
32/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value6,870 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.029
100/100
15%
Value21.2 s
1/100
10%
336 ms
806 ms
145 ms
324 ms
454 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Choise.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net and 3% (3 requests) were made to An.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Choise.com.
Page size can be reduced by 176.1 kB (26%)
670.1 kB
494.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Choise.com main page is 670.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 320.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 166.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 166.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Choise images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (49%)
80
41
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Choise. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
choise.com
336 ms
choise.com
806 ms
gtm.js
145 ms
41e22d86b258f9eb.css
324 ms
4df78f2cd73d6b26.css
454 ms
polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js
596 ms
webpack-d0487ecc9db5a46e.js
450 ms
framework-2645a99191cfc5e9.js
736 ms
main-802773bb9cd45b9a.js
585 ms
_app-33fd3cc9eacd66ca.js
963 ms
1155-9bdff225d04715b6.js
574 ms
8278-67f0a5151e704616.js
735 ms
2055-ca0164d4301b9e9f.js
701 ms
8198-73df96aef8543d51.js
739 ms
1848-a802deee1158ecaf.js
740 ms
7965-38e37b3a77f284b0.js
946 ms
index-3f44357d66c9fea4.js
846 ms
_buildManifest.js
845 ms
_ssgManifest.js
844 ms
logo.svg
839 ms
metamask.svg
959 ms
wallet-connect.svg
962 ms
binance-smart-wallet.svg
963 ms
coinbase-wallet.svg
974 ms
mobile-drop.svg
1056 ms
main-nav-drop-arrow.svg
1075 ms
main-nav-arrow.svg
1087 ms
es.svg
1093 ms
image
1351 ms
usdc.svg
1105 ms
image
1186 ms
image
1273 ms
image
1274 ms
image
1274 ms
crpt.svg
1274 ms
image
1315 ms
image
1345 ms
image
1354 ms
image
1260 ms
js
129 ms
analytics.js
56 ms
tag.js
1002 ms
pixel.js
113 ms
fbevents.js
22 ms
uwt.js
118 ms
collect
49 ms
image
1071 ms
rp.gif
47 ms
t2_pejb1668_telemetry
40 ms
collect
30 ms
js
49 ms
adsct
255 ms
adsct
301 ms
ga-audiences
176 ms
usdt.svg
1011 ms
image
958 ms
Circular-Medium.ab247b36.svg
929 ms
Circular-Book.763d98f3.svg
1165 ms
Circular-Bold.db09c3fe.svg
1250 ms
image
891 ms
image
865 ms
image
897 ms
image
902 ms
image
926 ms
art-safe-label-1.svg
870 ms
art-safe-label-2.svg
1024 ms
art-safe-label-3.svg
1026 ms
image
1123 ms
eu.svg
928 ms
insured.svg
2141 ms
ecosystem-arrow.svg
2134 ms
image
2266 ms
image
2392 ms
advert.gif
683 ms
sync_cookie_image_decide
139 ms
1
139 ms
sync_cookie
702 ms
yandex
56 ms
A501EAADE44374C8
1084 ms
ym_user_fe7880b9-42b4-4a05-99d5-95bca5907f0b
626 ms
ZHkABGXvTogAAAAJBE2AAw==
1057 ms
pixel
30 ms
pixel
14 ms
385 ms
sync
380 ms
match
6 ms
sync
383 ms
user-sync
52 ms
pixel
13 ms
sync
93 ms
psync
417 ms
choise.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
choise.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
choise.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Choise.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Choise.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
choise.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Choise. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: