Tools & Wizards About Us
chooseframingham.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

chooseframingham.com

Choose Framingham, MA - Official Website | Official Website

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

655 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

507 ms

chooseframingham.com screenshot

About Website

Visit chooseframingham.com now to see the best up-to-date Choose Framingham content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about chooseframingham.com

Framingham, Framingham MA, Learn more about living, learning, playing, enjoying and working in Framingham.

Visit chooseframingham.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Chooseframingham.com page load time and found that the first response time was 655 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

chooseframingham.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

60/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value800 ms

36/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.459

19/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.7 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

chooseframingham.com

655 ms

gtm.js

100 ms

antiforgery

90 ms

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

214 ms

jQuery-migrate-1.4.1.js

126 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Chooseframingham.com, 15% (11 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to D10lpsik1i8c69.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (655 ms) belongs to the original domain Chooseframingham.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 141.8 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Chooseframingham.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 100.8 kB

  • Original 124.3 kB
  • After minification 116.8 kB
  • After compression 23.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 10.9 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Choose Framingham images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 26.8 kB

  • Original 221.8 kB
  • After minification 221.7 kB
  • After compression 194.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 26.8 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 9.0 kB
  • After minification 9.0 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chooseframingham.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.3 kB or 37% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (59%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Choose Framingham. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

chooseframingham.com

chooseframingham.com

655 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

100 ms

antiforgery

antiforgery

90 ms

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

214 ms

jQuery-migrate-1.4.1.js

jQuery-migrate-1.4.1.js

126 ms

1190582903.css

1190582903.css

231 ms

-1188278656.css

-1188278656.css

203 ms

1910858510.js

1910858510.js

320 ms

jquery.ui.autocomplete.min.js

jquery.ui.autocomplete.min.js

136 ms

Search.js

Search.js

180 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

190 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

30 ms

ai.0.js

ai.0.js

18 ms

Calendar.js

Calendar.js

210 ms

745732998.css

745732998.css

209 ms

APIClient.js

APIClient.js

214 ms

Moment.min.js

Moment.min.js

240 ms

SplashModalRender.js

SplashModalRender.js

224 ms

-20650605.js

-20650605.js

430 ms

600x400

600x400

25 ms

Document

Document

61 ms

Document

Document

63 ms

Document

Document

64 ms

Document

Document

64 ms

Document

Document

62 ms

Document

Document

105 ms

Document

Document

119 ms

Document

Document

151 ms

Document

Document

120 ms

Document

Document

151 ms

Document

Document

153 ms

Document

Document

239 ms

Document

Document

197 ms

Document

Document

267 ms

Document

Document

319 ms

Document

Document

196 ms

Document

Document

198 ms

Document

Document

248 ms

Document

Document

245 ms

Document

Document

246 ms

Document

Document

296 ms

Document

Document

297 ms

Document

Document

297 ms

Document

Document

298 ms

Document

Document

315 ms

Document

Document

278 ms

Document

Document

276 ms

Document

Document

277 ms

Document

Document

278 ms

Document

Document

297 ms

Document

Document

301 ms

Document

Document

319 ms

Document

Document

324 ms

Document

Document

323 ms

Document

Document

296 ms

Document

Document

316 ms

Document

Document

319 ms

Document

Document

337 ms

w.js

w.js

37 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

25 ms

settings

settings

125 ms

settings.luckyorange.net

settings.luckyorange.net

12 ms

clickstream.legacy.js

clickstream.legacy.js

62 ms

timeline.e108540dddc96e4b707f5cf259a582d7.js

timeline.e108540dddc96e4b707f5cf259a582d7.js

3 ms

ChooseFram

ChooseFram

218 ms

Print.css

Print.css

49 ms

polyfills-a40ef1678bae11e696dba45124eadd70.js

polyfills-a40ef1678bae11e696dba45124eadd70.js

4 ms

runtime-b1c52fd0a13ead5fcf6b.js

runtime-b1c52fd0a13ead5fcf6b.js

18 ms

modules-96ebc7ac3ad66d681a3d.js

modules-96ebc7ac3ad66d681a3d.js

23 ms

main-babd9234dc048fb47339.js

main-babd9234dc048fb47339.js

30 ms

_app-a9c9f1a99e4414675fb1.js

_app-a9c9f1a99e4414675fb1.js

46 ms

%5BscreenName%5D-0517bdda27d5006a5a2d.js

%5BscreenName%5D-0517bdda27d5006a5a2d.js

45 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

56 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

57 ms

Accessibility Review

chooseframingham.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

chooseframingham.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

chooseframingham.com SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chooseframingham.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chooseframingham.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

chooseframingham.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Choose Framingham. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: