3.8 sec in total
271 ms
3 sec
516 ms
Click here to check amazing Chris And Hazel content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about chrisandhazel.co.uk
Husband and wife, camera wielding, wedding photography duo just waiting to capture your special South west wedding. Come and check out our work and drop us a message!
Visit chrisandhazel.co.ukWe analyzed Chrisandhazel.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 271 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
chrisandhazel.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value8.8 s
15/100
10%
Value1,150 ms
22/100
30%
Value1.273
1/100
15%
Value16.4 s
5/100
10%
271 ms
397 ms
36 ms
210 ms
213 ms
Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (92 requests) were addressed to the original Chrisandhazel.co.uk, 8% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Chrisandhazel.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 221.6 kB (3%)
8.1 MB
7.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Chrisandhazel.co.uk main page is 8.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 183.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 183.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 225 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chris And Hazel images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 20.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 17.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chrisandhazel.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (65%)
96
34
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chris And Hazel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
chrisandhazel.co.uk
271 ms
www.chrisandhazel.co.uk
397 ms
js
36 ms
style.min.css
210 ms
styles.css
213 ms
css
18 ms
extendify-utilities.css
213 ms
js_composer.min.css
373 ms
animate.css
215 ms
bootstrap.css
285 ms
et-line-icons.css
271 ms
font-awesome.min.css
359 ms
magnific-popup.css
273 ms
owl.carousel.css
293 ms
owl.transitions.css
366 ms
text-effect.css
365 ms
menu-hamburger.css
389 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
388 ms
style.css
538 ms
responsive.css
554 ms
extralayers.css
456 ms
elusive-icons.min.css
462 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
469 ms
jquery.min.js
471 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
585 ms
css
38 ms
js
89 ms
rs6.css
537 ms
index.js
538 ms
index.js
538 ms
rbtools.min.js
662 ms
rs6.min.js
770 ms
api.js
72 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
616 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
620 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
745 ms
index.js
618 ms
modernizr.js
743 ms
bootstrap.js
743 ms
bootstrap-hover-dropdown.js
744 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
766 ms
skrollr.min.js
844 ms
jquery.viewport.mini.js
846 ms
jquery.smooth-scroll.min.js
725 ms
wow.min.js
723 ms
page-scroll.js
720 ms
jquery.easypiechart.js
720 ms
jquery.parallax.js
723 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
724 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
709 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
710 ms
popup-gallery.js
642 ms
jquery.appear.js
640 ms
text-effect.js
720 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
702 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
703 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
704 ms
jquery.placeholder.min.js
636 ms
classie.js
630 ms
hamburger-menu.js
709 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js
713 ms
infinite-scroll.js
627 ms
analytics.js
34 ms
background-srcset.js
592 ms
main.js
565 ms
chrisandhazel-logo-light.png
695 ms
chrisandhazel-logo-dark.png
695 ms
laurelin_and_ross_wed002.jpg
916 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
78 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
46 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf
46 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
48 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
73 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
73 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
75 ms
collect
35 ms
wXK3E20CsoJ9j1DDkjHcQ5ZL8xRaxru9no1P3g.ttf
46 ms
wXK3E20CsoJ9j1DDkjHcQ5ZL8xRaxru9no1P3g.ttf
45 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
757 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
681 ms
Amie_and_gareth_001.jpg
849 ms
js
141 ms
recaptcha__en.js
120 ms
kim_and_martin001.jpg
585 ms
amie_and_gareth_wed003jpg.jpg
815 ms
ben_and_frankie_wed001.jpg
820 ms
caroline_and_scott_wed003.jpg
907 ms
craig_and_steph_wed_002.jpg
700 ms
lee_and_lois_wed002.jpg
874 ms
natasha_and_jake.jpg
714 ms
tina_and_sam002.jpg
916 ms
Bath-Wedding-Photographer-Hamswell-House-Wedding-Photography-Somerset-by-Chris-and-Hazel-Wedding-Photography-158.jpg
1079 ms
Bath-Wedding-Photographer-Botanical-Gardens-Wedding-Photography-Somerset-by-Chris-and-Hazel-Wedding-Photography-011.jpg
823 ms
drew-sarah-featured-image.jpg
914 ms
Greyfield-Wood-Wedding-Photographer-Somerset-Wedding-Photography-Bristol-by-Chris-and-Hazel-Wedding-Photography-005.jpg
976 ms
Avebury-Wedding-Photographer-Marlborough-Wedding-Photography-Wiltshire-by-Chris-and-Hazel-Wedding-Photography-011.jpg
1476 ms
Wiltshire-Wedding-Photographer-West-Barn-Fullingbridge-Farm-Barn-Wedding-Photography-Bradford-on-Avon-by-Chris-and-Hazel-Wedding-Photography-069.jpg
857 ms
Walled-Garden-Wedding-Photographer-Wells-Wedding-Photography-by-Chris-and-Hazel-Wedding-Photography-010.jpg
947 ms
Bath-Wedding-Photographer-Roman-Baths-Wedding-Photography-Somerset-by-Chris-and-Hazel-Wedding-Photography-056.jpg
1216 ms
Thumbnail-Wiltshire-Wedding-Photographer-The-Glove-Factory-Wedding-Photography-Trowbridge-by-Chris-and-Hazel-Wedding-Photography-064.jpg
938 ms
Bath-Wedding-Photographer-Roman-Baths-Wedding-Photography-Vath-City-Centre-by-Chris-and-Hazel-Wedding-Photography-076.jpg
999 ms
Huddersfield-Wedding-Photographer-The-Woodman-Inn-Wedding-Photography-Kirkburton-by-Chris-and-Hazel-Wedding-Photography-Lauren-and-Patrick-077.jpg
1033 ms
Yorkshire-Sculpture-Park-Wedding-Photographer-by-Chris-and-Hazel-Wedding-Photography-Patrick-Lauren-011.jpg
960 ms
Hull-Wedding-Photographer-Dunedinn-country-house-Wedding-Photography-Hull-by-Chris-and-Hazel-Wedding-Photography-Richard-Walker-Gemma-Wrightson-035.jpg
1011 ms
york-wedding-photographer-york-castle-museum-wedding-photography-york-by-chris-and-hazel-wedding-photography-don-hayes-helen-044.jpg
1105 ms
Ilkley-Wedding-Photographer-The-Craiglands-hotel-Wedding-Photography-Yorkshire-by-Chris-and-Hazel-Wedding-Photography-Sam-Nicholson-Emily-Nunwick-065.jpg
1043 ms
arrow-pre.png
1045 ms
arrow-next.png
1097 ms
heading-left.png
1048 ms
heading-right.png
1053 ms
chrisandhazel.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
chrisandhazel.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
chrisandhazel.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chrisandhazel.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chrisandhazel.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
chrisandhazel.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Chris And Hazel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: