Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

chrisisham.com

Southeast + Destination Fine Art Film Wedding & Portrait Photographer | Chris Isham

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

882 ms

chrisisham.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Chris Isham content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about chrisisham.com

Chris Isham | Southeast & Destination Fine Art Film Wedding & Portrait Photographer | Based in South Carolina | @chrisisham

Visit chrisisham.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Chrisisham.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

chrisisham.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.3 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

chrisisham.com

1079 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

31 ms

shortcodes.css

63 ms

style.min.css

71 ms

admin-bar.css

74 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Chrisisham.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Chrisisham.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 895.2 kB (28%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Chrisisham.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 87.5 kB

  • Original 100.0 kB
  • After minification 94.2 kB
  • After compression 12.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 782.1 kB

  • Original 2.8 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Chris Isham needs image optimization as it can save up to 782.1 kB or 28% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 23.3 kB

  • Original 234.6 kB
  • After minification 234.6 kB
  • After compression 211.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 67.7 kB
  • After minification 67.1 kB
  • After compression 65.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chrisisham.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (70%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chris Isham. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

chrisisham.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

SEO Factors

chrisisham.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chrisisham.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chrisisham.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Chris Isham. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: