Report Summary

  • 73

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

Page Load Speed

12.5 sec in total

First Response

298 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

10.6 sec

christopherleo.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Christopherleo content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about christopherleo.com

Research-based analysis and commentary

Visit christopherleo.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Christopherleo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 298 ms and then it took 12.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

christopherleo.com performance score

73

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

59/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

75/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.083

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.9 s

77/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

christopherleo.com

298 ms

115 ms

128 ms

style.css

112 ms

s1.wp.com

128 ms

Our browser made a total of 173 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Christopherleo.com, 50% (86 requests) were made to Christopherleo.files.wordpress.com and 14% (24 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (883 ms) relates to the external source Christopherleo.files.wordpress.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 818.2 kB (3%)

Content Size

30.7 MB

After Optimization

29.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Christopherleo.com main page is 30.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 29.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 149.4 kB

  • Original 203.5 kB
  • After minification 201.2 kB
  • After compression 54.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 149.4 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 56.7 kB

  • Original 29.6 MB
  • After minification 29.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Christopherleo images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 566.3 kB

  • Original 775.2 kB
  • After minification 650.4 kB
  • After compression 208.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 566.3 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 45.8 kB

  • Original 77.5 kB
  • After minification 74.8 kB
  • After compression 31.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Christopherleo.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 45.8 kB or 59% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (42%)

Requests Now

144

After Optimization

84

The browser has sent 144 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Christopherleo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

christopherleo.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

christopherleo.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

christopherleo.com SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Christopherleo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Christopherleo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Christopherleo. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: