Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

chrom.de

CHROM RECORDS • Electronic-Avantgarde, Neue Musik/Klassik, Darkwave , Synthpop • Label-Historie

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

320 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

chrom.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing CHROM content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about chrom.de

Das Label von Deine Lakaien, Ernst Horn, Alexander Veljanov, Helium Vola, Qntal, !distain, Helga Pogatschar, The Eternal Afflict…

Visit chrom.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Chrom.de page load time and found that the first response time was 320 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

chrom.de performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

48/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.408

24/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.7 s

79/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

chrom.de

320 ms

www.chrom.de

450 ms

jquery.min.js

219 ms

style-fonts-ck.css

304 ms

fontawesome4-uikit3.css

307 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Chrom.de, 29% (10 requests) were made to Chromrec.b-cdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (986 ms) relates to the external source Chromrec.b-cdn.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 74.0 kB (3%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Chrom.de main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 47.0 kB

  • Original 60.0 kB
  • After minification 60.0 kB
  • After compression 13.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 22.5 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CHROM images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 919 B

  • Original 109.0 kB
  • After minification 109.0 kB
  • After compression 108.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 48.7 kB
  • After minification 48.5 kB
  • After compression 45.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chrom.de has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (38%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

18

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CHROM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

chrom.de accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

chrom.de best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

chrom.de SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chrom.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chrom.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of CHROM. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: