3.4 sec in total
262 ms
2.6 sec
572 ms
Click here to check amazing Chrome content for Brazil. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about chrome.pt
Hosting, Registo de Dominios .PT .COM .NET .INFO .EU .ORG, Alojamento Web, Servidores Dedicados, VPS, Backups, Certificados SSL, e-commerce, lojas online
Visit chrome.ptWe analyzed Chrome.pt page load time and found that the first response time was 262 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
chrome.pt performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value11.0 s
0/100
25%
Value8.5 s
17/100
10%
Value1,010 ms
27/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.4 s
19/100
10%
262 ms
631 ms
154 ms
386 ms
72 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Chrome.pt, 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (891 ms) belongs to the original domain Chrome.pt.
Page size can be reduced by 725.2 kB (51%)
1.4 MB
704.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Chrome.pt main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 652.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 544.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 544.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chrome images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 175.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 175.7 kB or 32% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (46%)
76
41
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chrome. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
chrome.pt
262 ms
chrome.pt
631 ms
jquery.min.js
154 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
386 ms
js
72 ms
js
116 ms
app.js
349 ms
rbtools.min.js
576 ms
rs6.min.js
712 ms
bundle.js
447 ms
wordlift-cloud.js
632 ms
imagesLoaded.js
447 ms
jquery.lazyload.js
478 ms
etheme-scripts.min.js
535 ms
tabs.min.js
534 ms
swiper.min.js
719 ms
fixedHeader.min.js
629 ms
promoTextCarousel.min.js
660 ms
mega-menu.min.js
706 ms
ajaxSearch.min.js
716 ms
mobileMenu.min.js
723 ms
ethemeGeneralTabs.min.js
746 ms
disable-submit.js
792 ms
index.js
798 ms
index.js
802 ms
davidwalsh.js
804 ms
back-top.min.js
809 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
831 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
879 ms
waypoints.min.js
884 ms
frontend.min.js
890 ms
lazyload.min.js
891 ms
gtm.js
222 ms
dummy.png
798 ms
drag.png
756 ms
font
209 ms
xstore-icons-light.ttf
729 ms
xstore-icons-light.ttf
822 ms
font
237 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
712 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
792 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
794 ms
chrome-1.png
123 ms
search.png
202 ms
savings-money.svg
203 ms
transfer.svg
205 ms
lock.png
250 ms
seo.png
266 ms
tab-2.png
268 ms
3em1.png
265 ms
1474042130_life-buoy.png
276 ms
1474042156_wrench-screwdriver.png
290 ms
1474028446_cmyk-03.png
347 ms
1474028396_advantage_quality.png
364 ms
dotpt-qcecm94n2b17qgro0crlfdmwbmtbviilr96qj1v6di.png
363 ms
doteu-qcecz3l8gsmaem3wzwo1i4xol7hx2lijiu5mn6thc6.png
364 ms
dotcom-qcecyw2iy4bztqeu7tf0y6tzu4izd0ootsxqsz4mpy.png
364 ms
dotnet-qcecymo51rz4lmshqpcr997dw9tb81ndgiew07ikg6.png
375 ms
dotorg-qcecyg39pxq4cd21t4id9sv5qkpqq5x93luhn9sbnq.png
434 ms
dotes-qcecy8kk79ftrhcz119cpurgzhqt0l3eekmlt23h1i.png
449 ms
dotfr-qcecn60zpia90tfvo8zjcnc144b6cx57js0qbqiebq.png
450 ms
http-domain-1.svg
449 ms
survey-mail.png
451 ms
dns.svg
461 ms
comodologo.png
535 ms
domain_prom.jpg
543 ms
shop-2.jpg
560 ms
brand-2-1-q2izldv2pardkso07mpd1xe1ysoq3iyi6vris7x2wk.png
559 ms
ptacr-q2izldv2pardkso07mpd1xe1ysoq3iyi6vris7x2wk.png
560 ms
mariadb-q2izldv2pardkso07mpd1xe1ysoq3iyi6vris7x2wk.png
560 ms
cloudlinux-q2izldv2pardkso07mpd1xe1ysoq3iyi6vris7x2wk.jpg
621 ms
plesk-q2izldv2pardkso07mpd1xe1ysoq3iyi6vris7x2wk.png
626 ms
apache-q2izldv2pardkso07mpd1xe1ysoq3iyi6vris7x2wk.png
644 ms
php-q2izldv2pardkso07mpd1xe1ysoq3iyi6vris7x2wk.png
557 ms
clock.png
526 ms
email-1.png
502 ms
ticket.png
512 ms
chat.png
516 ms
chrome-q2izldv18o8ic2vyf1onbaj1arb2m92f0yi2fz4vfk.png
532 ms
chromeqr.png
546 ms
pt_rodape.png
546 ms
i006574-qipsepfr5ri6mccui1zh2c7f11cvt2w6j05s5qiq3e.png
503 ms
pagamento.png
549 ms
logo-cookieyes.svg
539 ms
chrome.pt accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
chrome.pt best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
chrome.pt SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
PT
PT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chrome.pt can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Portuguese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chrome.pt main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
chrome.pt
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Chrome. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: