14.8 sec in total
2 sec
11.3 sec
1.5 sec
Welcome to chs.com.au homepage info - get ready to check Chs best content for Australia right away, or after learning these important things about chs.com.au
We are the supply specialist of hospitality industry & hardware products in Southport. We supply Coffee Caddies, Housekeeping, Bathroom Accessories & many more products in different markets
Visit chs.com.auWe analyzed Chs.com.au page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 12.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
chs.com.au performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
16/100
10%
Value21.4 s
0/100
25%
Value12.7 s
3/100
10%
Value510 ms
57/100
30%
Value0.266
46/100
15%
Value45.6 s
0/100
10%
2017 ms
48 ms
40 ms
43 ms
41 ms
Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Chs.com.au, 7% (7 requests) were made to Cdn.neto.com.au and 6% (6 requests) were made to C.statcounter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9 sec) belongs to the original domain Chs.com.au.
Page size can be reduced by 309.1 kB (8%)
4.0 MB
3.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Chs.com.au main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 274.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 274.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Chs images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 948 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chs.com.au has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (40%)
91
55
The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chs. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.chs.com.au
2017 ms
font-awesome.min.css
48 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.18.custom.css
40 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
43 ms
app.css
41 ms
style.css
1524 ms
slick.css
1318 ms
css
93 ms
css
109 ms
counter.js
92 ms
gtm.js
103 ms
gtm.js
154 ms
website_logo.png
1332 ms
75.jpg
2529 ms
55.jpg
9046 ms
54.jpg
408 ms
CHS80401A.jpg
586 ms
46 ms
up_loader.1.1.0.js
34 ms
analytics.js
32 ms
js
80 ms
hotjar-1883522.js
218 ms
62 ms
collect
146 ms
56.jpg
385 ms
57.jpg
405 ms
58.jpg
425 ms
59.jpg
456 ms
60.jpg
479 ms
61.jpg
503 ms
62.jpg
529 ms
63.jpg
589 ms
CHS80402A.jpg
636 ms
CHS80438A.jpg
680 ms
119-1.png
696 ms
120-1.png
714 ms
121-1.png
735 ms
122-1.png
750 ms
123-1.png
768 ms
124-1.png
782 ms
125-1.png
798 ms
126-1.png
822 ms
64.png
847 ms
65.jpg
868 ms
66.png
885 ms
67.png
908 ms
68.jpg
927 ms
70.jpg
942 ms
71.jpg
968 ms
72.jpg
982 ms
73.jpg
998 ms
74.png
1026 ms
jquery.min.js
103 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
137 ms
main.js
181 ms
jquery.cookie.js
138 ms
bootstrap.min.js
146 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.18.custom.min.js
155 ms
pop_up_script_neto_tag_live.js
550 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
151 ms
custom.js
2594 ms
90 ms
loader.js
78 ms
collect
58 ms
modules.bab19612e24942353c1e.js
36 ms
25 ms
call-tracking_7.js
5 ms
slick.min.js
858 ms
ga-audiences
14 ms
wcm
12 ms
69.png
710 ms
39-1.jpg
716 ms
footerlogo.png
713 ms
icon-top-envelope.png
39 ms
icon-top-phone.png
1205 ms
icon-top-user.png
1293 ms
font
57 ms
Gotham-Medium.woff
1485 ms
Gotham-Book.woff
2736 ms
font
57 ms
Gotham-Black.woff
2664 ms
t.php
112 ms
t.php
135 ms
t.php
127 ms
t.php
110 ms
t.php
109 ms
t.php
108 ms
collect
52 ms
ajax_loader
991 ms
addtocart
5014 ms
remove.gif
1315 ms
add.gif
69 ms
119-2.png
93 ms
120-2.png
111 ms
121-2.png
132 ms
122-2.png
149 ms
123-2.png
193 ms
124-2.png
238 ms
125-2.png
260 ms
126-2.png
281 ms
chs.com.au accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
chs.com.au best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
chs.com.au SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chs.com.au can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chs.com.au main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
chs.com.au
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Chs. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: