3.3 sec in total
307 ms
2.5 sec
469 ms
Visit cibleweb.com now to see the best up-to-date Cibleweb content for Canada and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cibleweb.com
Notre agence digitale vous accompagne dans la définition et la mise en place de votre stratégie web : webmarketing, SEO, création de site web
Visit cibleweb.comWe analyzed Cibleweb.com page load time and found that the first response time was 307 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
cibleweb.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
9/100
10%
Value5.1 s
25/100
25%
Value8.0 s
21/100
10%
Value2,460 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.128
82/100
15%
Value12.1 s
16/100
10%
307 ms
160 ms
164 ms
173 ms
174 ms
Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Cibleweb.com, 7% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to I0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (827 ms) belongs to the original domain Cibleweb.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (64%)
3.4 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Cibleweb.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 81.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 141.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cibleweb needs image optimization as it can save up to 141.4 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 944.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 944.9 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 997.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cibleweb.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 997.4 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (78%)
90
20
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cibleweb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.cibleweb.com
307 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
160 ms
cache.skin.css
164 ms
style.min.css
173 ms
styles.css
174 ms
settings.css
189 ms
portfolio_shortcode.css
196 ms
spiral-simple-subscribe.css
246 ms
testimonials_shortcode.css
238 ms
spiral-tweet-scroller.css
258 ms
typicons.css
258 ms
whhg.css
373 ms
big_mug.css
281 ms
entypo.css
316 ms
font_awesome.css
334 ms
google_material.css
343 ms
icomoon.css
346 ms
ionicon.css
381 ms
icomoon.css
396 ms
icons.css
421 ms
css
25 ms
core_style.css
428 ms
scripts.css
429 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
464 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
467 ms
style.css
629 ms
responsive.css
507 ms
style.css
512 ms
titan-framework-cfc-css.css
512 ms
jetpack.css
557 ms
jquery.js
688 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
595 ms
custom.min.js
596 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
769 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
744 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.js
686 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
56 ms
js
19 ms
e-201609.js
5 ms
init.js
647 ms
comment-reply.min.js
660 ms
photon.js
657 ms
jquery.form.min.js
653 ms
scripts.js
701 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
684 ms
spiral-simple-subscribe.js
742 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
700 ms
init.js
689 ms
spiral-tweet-scroller.js
692 ms
frontend.js
723 ms
scripts.js
827 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
734 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
649 ms
core.min.js
688 ms
widget.min.js
688 ms
accordion.min.js
693 ms
effect.min.js
750 ms
effect-slide.min.js
732 ms
custom.js
718 ms
widget.js
738 ms
wp-embed.min.js
755 ms
analytics.js
17 ms
linkid.js
21 ms
collect
47 ms
collect
60 ms
ga-audiences
97 ms
fbevents.js
179 ms
referencement.jpg
56 ms
flux.jpg
61 ms
sildeok1.jpg
53 ms
formation.jpg
52 ms
sildeok-21.jpg
59 ms
sildeok-31.jpg
57 ms
logo-cibleweb-2.png
709 ms
15ans.jpg
710 ms
erdf.jpg
712 ms
famille-mary.jpg
713 ms
baush.jpg
710 ms
citadium.jpg
714 ms
poste.jpg
716 ms
cyrillus.jpg
711 ms
shilton.jpg
717 ms
valette1.jpg
718 ms
rss.png
713 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3bO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
60 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTaRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff
60 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzKRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff
61 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12b73hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff
60 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaI73hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff
61 ms
cIFypx4yrWPDz3zOxk7hIQLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.woff
61 ms
8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-k73hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff
58 ms
core_icomoon.ttf
657 ms
28 ms
29 ms
livechat-new.js
22 ms
loader.gif
99 ms
g.gif
30 ms
livechat-cloud-new.js
56 ms
livechat-v2.js
16 ms
preferences
403 ms
cibleweb.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cibleweb.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
cibleweb.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cibleweb.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cibleweb.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cibleweb.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cibleweb. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: