Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

cidead.es

Portada - CIDEAD Centro para la Innovación y Desarrollo de la Educación a Distancia | Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

526 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

126 ms

cidead.es screenshot

About Website

Visit cidead.es now to see the best up-to-date CIDEAD content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cidead.es

Página de Inicio del Cidead

Visit cidead.es

Key Findings

We analyzed Cidead.es page load time and found that the first response time was 526 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cidead.es performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.129

82/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.4 s

49/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cidead.es

526 ms

mm_menu.js

300 ms

fondo_edu.gif

201 ms

lg_mec.gif

299 ms

lg_edu.gif

298 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Cidead.es and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Cidead.es.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 46.1 kB (35%)

Content Size

132.2 kB

After Optimization

86.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Cidead.es main page is 132.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 85.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 13.5 kB

  • Original 16.9 kB
  • After minification 15.7 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 8.4 kB

  • Original 85.3 kB
  • After minification 77.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CIDEAD images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 24.2 kB

  • Original 30.0 kB
  • After minification 24.9 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 24.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (49%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

22

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CIDEAD. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

cidead.es accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

cidead.es best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

cidead.es SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cidead.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cidead.es main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CIDEAD. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: