2.5 sec in total
45 ms
2 sec
381 ms
Click here to check amazing Cidewalk content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cidewalk.com
Self Service Digital Billboard Ads & Local Mobile Advertising
Visit cidewalk.comWe analyzed Cidewalk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 45 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
cidewalk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value8.9 s
1/100
25%
Value10.4 s
8/100
10%
Value22,740 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.196
63/100
15%
Value35.7 s
0/100
10%
45 ms
517 ms
28 ms
182 ms
181 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Cidewalk.com, 12% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Cdn2.editmysite.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (632 ms) relates to the external source Koi-gtdbxfxq.marketingautomation.services.
Page size can be reduced by 442.3 kB (38%)
1.2 MB
714.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Cidewalk.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 680.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 59.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cidewalk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 310.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 310.7 kB or 46% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 64.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cidewalk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 64.8 kB or 58% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (73%)
48
13
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cidewalk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cidewalk.com
45 ms
www.cidewalk.com
517 ms
font-awesome.min.css
28 ms
sites.css
182 ms
fancybox.css
181 ms
main_style.css
530 ms
css
111 ms
css
153 ms
css
160 ms
templateArtifacts.js
395 ms
jquery.min.js
137 ms
main.js
280 ms
ftl.js
310 ms
fbevents.js
214 ms
ss.js
317 ms
jquery.min.js
80 ms
js
117 ms
noform.js
307 ms
plugins.js
628 ms
custom.js
590 ms
mobile.js
591 ms
oct.js
69 ms
43 ms
net
327 ms
260813647.jpg
204 ms
1431535151.png
143 ms
5896602.png
200 ms
3606413_orig.png
140 ms
4829833.png
116 ms
9341537.png
252 ms
6102291_orig.png
198 ms
3675157_orig.png
253 ms
3359429_orig.png
253 ms
analytics.js
120 ms
sp.js
92 ms
1bHRUMxmJHoup12DnI9XmQ.woff
143 ms
kU6VHbqMAZhaN_nXCmLQsQ.woff
165 ms
I1Pn3gihk5vyP0Yw5GqKsQ.woff
284 ms
GdZvpAq9shJukTEvSQbePw.woff
289 ms
hpORcvLZtemlH8gI-1S-7hsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
308 ms
DVKQJxMmC9WF_oplMzlQqT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
288 ms
lILlYDvubYemzYzN7GbLkBa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
289 ms
632 ms
social-icons-orange.png
217 ms
collect
66 ms
collect
218 ms
adsct
252 ms
adsct
251 ms
visitor.css
105 ms
visitor.js
253 ms
ga.js
219 ms
quant.js
218 ms
ga-audiences
171 ms
0
109 ms
teamstatus
400 ms
pixel;r=1797266645;a=p-0dYLvhSGGqUWo;labels=l15%2Cu49215843.u49215843s833540819533973890;fpan=1;fpa=P0-1618270734-1456876093119;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1456876093118;tzo=-180;ref=;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cidewalk.com%2F;ogl=site_name.Instant%252E%20Local%252E%20Mobile%252E%20Ads%2Ctitle.Cidewalk%252Ecom%2Cdescription.Grow%20Your%20Business%20-%20Instant%252E%20Local%252E%20Mobile%252E%20Ads%252E%0A%0AStart%20Your%20Free%207%20Day%20Trial%20T%2Curl.http%3A%2F%2Fwww%252Ecidewalk%252Ecom%2F%2Cimage%3Awidth.800%2Cimage%3Aheight.400
69 ms
__utm.gif
39 ms
__utm.gif
34 ms
collect
15 ms
ga-audiences
17 ms
cidewalk.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
cidewalk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Requests the geolocation permission on page load
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
cidewalk.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cidewalk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cidewalk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cidewalk.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cidewalk. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: