4.8 sec in total
380 ms
4.2 sec
181 ms
Click here to check amazing Cidm content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cidm.in
Disaster Management | Natural Disaster | Earthquake Disaster | Floods | Floods in India | Disaster Management in India | Project In Disaster Management
Visit cidm.inWe analyzed Cidm.in page load time and found that the first response time was 380 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
cidm.in performance score
380 ms
762 ms
787 ms
190 ms
379 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Cidm.in, 61% (25 requests) were made to Cidm.ficci.in and 12% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Cidm.ficci.in.
Page size can be reduced by 879.0 kB (55%)
1.6 MB
705.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Cidm.in main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 9.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.0 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.3 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 628.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cidm needs image optimization as it can save up to 628.9 kB or 58% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 224.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 224.3 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cidm.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.5 kB or 20% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (44%)
34
19
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cidm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cidm.in
380 ms
cidm.in
762 ms
www.cidm.ficci.in
787 ms
default.css
190 ms
pascal.css
379 ms
orman.css
558 ms
nivo-slider.css
564 ms
style.css
564 ms
style4.css
566 ms
menu.css
566 ms
jquery.js
567 ms
menu.js
741 ms
bootstrap.css
38 ms
font-awesome.min.css
32 ms
pro_dropdown_3.css
763 ms
stuHover.js
765 ms
analytics.js
40 ms
o1M3-Ao71QI
129 ms
blount_background_top.jpg
512 ms
logo2.png
510 ms
logo21.png
510 ms
3.gif
508 ms
three_0.gif
509 ms
image.fw.png
1499 ms
green-tab.jpg
527 ms
orange.jpg
526 ms
pointer1.png
526 ms
blue-tab.jpg
526 ms
blog5.png
712 ms
ads.jpg
712 ms
blount_background_bottom.jpg
892 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
17 ms
www-player.css
10 ms
www-embed-player.js
30 ms
base.js
53 ms
ad_status.js
216 ms
WsXbK1pRbMq5q9MM2Qg4E26D0rL5j6ju-xVNTyhKTHk.js
146 ms
embed.js
57 ms
id
39 ms
Create
146 ms
GenerateIT
15 ms
cidm.in SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cidm.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cidm.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cidm.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cidm. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: