Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

ciiva.com

Electronic Part Selection and BOM Management

Page Load Speed

915 ms in total

First Response

47 ms

Resources Loaded

734 ms

Page Rendered

134 ms

ciiva.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ciiva content for Switzerland. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ciiva.com

Cloud-based Bill of Material (BOM) management software, search electronic component and datasheet, check lifecycle and alternative, compare stock and price.

Visit ciiva.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ciiva.com page load time and found that the first response time was 47 ms and then it took 868 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ciiva.com performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

50/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value280 ms

80/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

63/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ciiva.com

47 ms

ciiva.com

180 ms

csshome

36 ms

ruxitagentjs_ICA2SVfqr_10163190306152756.js

118 ms

jquery.min.js

44 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Ciiva.com, 9% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.bizible.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (259 ms) belongs to the original domain Ciiva.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 144.7 kB (36%)

Content Size

407.1 kB

After Optimization

262.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Ciiva.com main page is 407.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 146.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 104.4 kB

  • Original 126.4 kB
  • After minification 96.1 kB
  • After compression 21.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 30.3 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 7.9 kB

  • Original 146.3 kB
  • After minification 138.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ciiva images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 32.3 kB

  • Original 134.4 kB
  • After minification 134.4 kB
  • After compression 102.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.3 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (54%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

12

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ciiva. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ciiva.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Best Practices

ciiva.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ciiva.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ciiva.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ciiva.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ciiva. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: