Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

cimteq.com

Cable Design and Manufacturing Software | Cimteq UK

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

100 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

407 ms

cimteq.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cimteq.com homepage info - get ready to check Cimteq best content right away, or after learning these important things about cimteq.com

At Cimteq we are passionate about making the design and manufacture of Cables process more efficient. Book a consultation today.

Visit cimteq.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cimteq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 100 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cimteq.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,100 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.4 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cimteq.com

100 ms

cimteq.com

104 ms

wire-and-cable-design-and-manufacturing-software

62 ms

google_tag.script.js

22 ms

css_CJwXwEfDqxv-j8-tkjMnrEFnZSidMxWbDYvilUTwK00.css

473 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Cimteq.com, 89% (67 requests) were made to Ul.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Static.addtoany.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (473 ms) relates to the external source Ul.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 346.8 kB (28%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

897.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Cimteq.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 742.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 190.0 kB

  • Original 223.8 kB
  • After minification 187.1 kB
  • After compression 33.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 36.7 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 190.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 114 B

  • Original 182.2 kB
  • After minification 182.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cimteq images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 132.5 kB

  • Original 742.9 kB
  • After minification 741.9 kB
  • After compression 610.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 132.5 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 24.2 kB

  • Original 95.5 kB
  • After minification 95.5 kB
  • After compression 71.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cimteq.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.2 kB or 25% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (80%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

10

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cimteq. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

cimteq.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

cimteq.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

cimteq.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cimteq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cimteq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cimteq. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: