Tools & Wizards About Us
cinefil.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

cinefil.org

Festival Cinéfil

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

410 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

448 ms

cinefil.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Cinefil content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cinefil.org

Festival Cinéfil - Biennale Cinéma, Écrans et Marionnettes du 24 au 27 novembre 2022 à Charleville-Mézières, Ardennes.

Visit cinefil.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Cinefil.org page load time and found that the first response time was 410 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cinefil.org performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value17.2 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value35.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.17

70/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value42.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cinefil.org

410 ms

autoptimize_a2959d9a6fac2b2152779f21f3ae1fda.css

401 ms

autoptimize_single_938034cd503a5243a9a503528a5ee2e1.css

313 ms

autoptimize_single_02556f1f074f6eeae1d2dbbd0e340d19.css

317 ms

autoptimize_single_77a0586cfb6850d95cf948dfc72e9cab.css

320 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Cinefil.org, 6% (2 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (861 ms) belongs to the original domain Cinefil.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (10%)

Content Size

10.2 MB

After Optimization

9.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cinefil.org main page is 10.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 9.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 47.5 kB

  • Original 61.5 kB
  • After minification 61.4 kB
  • After compression 14.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 966.6 kB

  • Original 9.7 MB
  • After minification 8.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cinefil images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 36 B

  • Original 301.4 kB
  • After minification 301.4 kB
  • After compression 301.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 357 B

  • Original 206.2 kB
  • After minification 206.2 kB
  • After compression 205.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cinefil.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (58%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cinefil. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cinefil.org

cinefil.org

410 ms

autoptimize_a2959d9a6fac2b2152779f21f3ae1fda.css

autoptimize_a2959d9a6fac2b2152779f21f3ae1fda.css

401 ms

autoptimize_single_938034cd503a5243a9a503528a5ee2e1.css

autoptimize_single_938034cd503a5243a9a503528a5ee2e1.css

313 ms

autoptimize_single_02556f1f074f6eeae1d2dbbd0e340d19.css

autoptimize_single_02556f1f074f6eeae1d2dbbd0e340d19.css

317 ms

autoptimize_single_77a0586cfb6850d95cf948dfc72e9cab.css

autoptimize_single_77a0586cfb6850d95cf948dfc72e9cab.css

320 ms

all.css

all.css

34 ms

autoptimize_single_4ec72b85cbd98ff25729ad545cc41b3a.css

autoptimize_single_4ec72b85cbd98ff25729ad545cc41b3a.css

320 ms

autoptimize_single_4f95deb3ae5ed32c09c20957a7a61164.css

autoptimize_single_4f95deb3ae5ed32c09c20957a7a61164.css

390 ms

v4-shims.css

v4-shims.css

44 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

476 ms

js

js

58 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

372 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

373 ms

autoptimize_da68e6ca4ed4277c99617474ba753c9f.js

autoptimize_da68e6ca4ed4277c99617474ba753c9f.js

783 ms

logo-cinefil-2024.png

logo-cinefil-2024.png

89 ms

banniere-film-maternelles.png

banniere-film-maternelles.png

861 ms

banniere-film-primaires.png

banniere-film-primaires.png

471 ms

Banniere-cinefil-colleges.png

Banniere-cinefil-colleges.png

715 ms

Banniere-cinefil-lycee.webp

Banniere-cinefil-lycee.webp

167 ms

forme_bleu2.png

forme_bleu2.png

247 ms

1410Rouna.woff

1410Rouna.woff

257 ms

rouna-regular-webfont.woff

rouna-regular-webfont.woff

242 ms

7457Rouna.woff

7457Rouna.woff

333 ms

rouna-medium-webfont.woff

rouna-medium-webfont.woff

306 ms

2659Rouna.woff

2659Rouna.woff

364 ms

rouna-bold-webfont.woff

rouna-bold-webfont.woff

311 ms

8624Rouna.woff

8624Rouna.woff

411 ms

rouna-regularitalic-webfont.woff

rouna-regularitalic-webfont.woff

328 ms

9771Rouna.woff

9771Rouna.woff

443 ms

rouna-mediumitalic-webfont.woff

rouna-mediumitalic-webfont.woff

328 ms

1218Rouna.woff

1218Rouna.woff

470 ms

rouna-bolditalic-webfont.woff

rouna-bolditalic-webfont.woff

328 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

495 ms

elementskit.woff

elementskit.woff

604 ms

Accessibility Review

cinefil.org accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

cinefil.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

cinefil.org SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cinefil.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cinefil.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cinefil.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cinefil. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: