14.6 sec in total
291 ms
14.1 sec
256 ms
Visit cinteco.com now to see the best up-to-date Cinteco content for Mexico and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cinteco.com
Psicólogos, Psiquiatras y Logopedas en Madrid, expertos en psicología clínica y psiquiatría. Nuestro gabinete de psicologia está situado en Madrid centro.
Visit cinteco.comWe analyzed Cinteco.com page load time and found that the first response time was 291 ms and then it took 14.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
cinteco.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value6.7 s
7/100
25%
Value14.7 s
1/100
10%
Value410 ms
67/100
30%
Value0.605
10/100
15%
Value10.7 s
22/100
10%
291 ms
2492 ms
45 ms
29 ms
2 ms
Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (84 requests) were addressed to the original Cinteco.com, 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to C0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Cinteco.com.
Page size can be reduced by 203.5 kB (25%)
821.4 kB
617.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Cinteco.com main page is 821.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 256.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 106.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 106.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cinteco images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 46.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 46.3 kB or 18% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cinteco.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.5 kB or 20% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (74%)
91
24
The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cinteco. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 39 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cinteco.com
291 ms
www.cinteco.com
2492 ms
css
45 ms
style.min.css
29 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
2 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
2 ms
css
17 ms
css
24 ms
easy-columns.css
92 ms
css
20 ms
cinteco_mini.png
196 ms
happy1.jpg
626 ms
jquery.min.js
8 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
9 ms
lightbox.js
338 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
377 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
373 ms
jquery.validate.js
295 ms
flatpickr.min.js
290 ms
select2.min.js
394 ms
cv.js
405 ms
frontend.min.js
426 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
465 ms
custom_params.js
464 ms
superfish.combined.js
472 ms
script.js
475 ms
selectnav.min.js
514 ms
selectnav-options.js
551 ms
complianz.min.js
557 ms
comment-reply.min.js
5 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
560 ms
consulta_online2.jpg
566 ms
abc.png
620 ms
cope.png
656 ms
el_confidencial.png
655 ms
el_mundo.png
655 ms
el_pais.png
656 ms
es_radio.png
672 ms
la_vanguardia.png
693 ms
mia.png
729 ms
tve.png
730 ms
twitter-icon.png
735 ms
facebook-icon.png
741 ms
email-icon.png
761 ms
rss-icon.png
781 ms
css
18 ms
css
19 ms
cinteco5.png
711 ms
main-menu-btm-border.png
1897 ms
bg.png
718 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFnOkEk30e0.ttf
15 ms
home-page-before-content-top.png
720 ms
4UaHrEJCrhhnVA3DgluA96rp4g.ttf
5 ms
www.cinteco.com
1860 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
289 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
329 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
331 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
6 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
19 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
28 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
29 ms
formidableforms.css
89 ms
cv.css
96 ms
settings.css
93 ms
settings.css
93 ms
loader.gif
90 ms
style.css
90 ms
frontend.min.css
92 ms
flatpickr.min.css
88 ms
select2.min.css
88 ms
wp125.css
88 ms
cookieblocker.min.css
90 ms
pagenavi-css.css
88 ms
style.css
89 ms
style.css
88 ms
reset.css
91 ms
text.css
89 ms
960.css
91 ms
superfish.css
89 ms
auto-arrows.png
149 ms
prettyPhoto.css
93 ms
font-awesome.min.css
91 ms
fontello.css
96 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
253 ms
fontello.woff
338 ms
animation.css
90 ms
style.css
96 ms
main-menu-btm-border.png
88 ms
heading_underline.png
92 ms
sidebar-search.png
98 ms
light-round-button-l.png
88 ms
light-round-button-r.png
95 ms
pull-quote-dark.png
92 ms
double-arrow.png
177 ms
custom_style.css
93 ms
home-page-content-top.png
89 ms
responsive.css
94 ms
fluid.css
89 ms
style.css
92 ms
js_composer.min.css
104 ms
custom.css
88 ms
addthis_wordpress_public.min.css
89 ms
cinteco.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cinteco.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
cinteco.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cinteco.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cinteco.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cinteco.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cinteco. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: