12 sec in total
289 ms
11.2 sec
488 ms
Click here to check amazing Cio De content for Spain. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ciode.net
CIODE, empresa de oro de inversión y proveedor de metales preciosos online. Transacciones de compraventa de forma fácil y segura. ¡Te asesoramos!
Visit ciode.netWe analyzed Ciode.net page load time and found that the first response time was 289 ms and then it took 11.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
ciode.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value16.2 s
0/100
25%
Value12.0 s
4/100
10%
Value3,370 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.059
98/100
15%
Value17.9 s
4/100
10%
289 ms
1491 ms
303 ms
301 ms
313 ms
Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ciode.net, 63% (65 requests) were made to Ciode.es and 13% (13 requests) were made to Sw-assets.ekomiapps.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Ciode.es.
Page size can be reduced by 280.6 kB (24%)
1.2 MB
899.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Ciode.net main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 634.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 262.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 262.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cio De images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 11.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ciode.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (78%)
82
18
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cio De. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ciode.net
289 ms
ciode.es
1491 ms
storeclosing-style.css
303 ms
cleantalk-public.min.css
301 ms
styles.css
313 ms
core_style.css
310 ms
light_style.css
300 ms
price-drop-custom.css
384 ms
cookieblocker.min.css
591 ms
webfont.min.css
593 ms
public.min.css
591 ms
free-shipping.css
600 ms
flatsome.css
694 ms
flatsome-shop.css
685 ms
style.css
882 ms
jquery.min.js
973 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
887 ms
storeclosing.js
893 ms
apbct-public-bundle.min.js
886 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
986 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
1174 ms
js.cookie.min.js
1181 ms
awscript.js
1176 ms
email-decode.min.js
809 ms
4112816.js
60 ms
wc-blocks.css
1244 ms
index.js
1335 ms
index.js
1335 ms
collapse.js
1407 ms
price-drop-custom.js
1407 ms
woocommerce.min.js
1406 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
1406 ms
order-attribution.min.js
1641 ms
api.js
33 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
1642 ms
public.min.js
1727 ms
flatsome-live-search.js
1727 ms
api.js
65 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1732 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1726 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
2163 ms
index.js
1726 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
1784 ms
flatsome.js
1870 ms
flatsome-lazy-load.js
1780 ms
woocommerce.js
1779 ms
complianz.min.js
2028 ms
underscore.min.js
1784 ms
wp-util.min.js
1602 ms
add-to-cart-variation.min.js
1816 ms
gtm.js
313 ms
ekomi_logo.png
237 ms
logo.png
677 ms
868b6cfe0b3d0b4de16dcaef2e144af5.gif
678 ms
logo-CIODE-centro-inversion-oro-diamantes.png
979 ms
formas-pago.png
987 ms
2024-05-09-Ciode-Diamantes-web-slide-textos.png
1000 ms
SEMPSA-280x280.jpg
1303 ms
invertir-en-oro-280x280.png
882 ms
fl-icons.ttf
888 ms
widget.js
74 ms
be.js
98 ms
4112816.js
109 ms
4112816.js
144 ms
conversations-embed.js
75 ms
x-widget.js
30 ms
js
85 ms
destination
53 ms
c3po.jpg
403 ms
recaptcha__es.js
45 ms
recaptcha__en.js
58 ms
gtm.js
31 ms
font-awesome.min.css
85 ms
sf139408605a00974eb83.json
68 ms
sf1394086054a4850082b.json
71 ms
ciode.es
969 ms
widget.css
51 ms
139408_seller_summary.json
102 ms
139408_schema.json
28 ms
es_seal_gold-105.png
4 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
48 ms
stars_grey-173x29.png
8 ms
stars_green-173x29.png
9 ms
HelveticaNeueLTStd-Bd.woff
38 ms
Lato-Bold.woff
3 ms
Lato-Light.woff
38 ms
HelveticaNeueLTStd-Md.woff
37 ms
%7B%7BHelveticaNeueLTStd-Bd-woff
1007 ms
%7B%7BHelveticaNeueLTStd-Md-woff
1054 ms
es_seal_gold-33.png
9 ms
stars_grey-129x22.png
9 ms
stars_yellow-129x22.png
8 ms
opensans-regular-webfont.woff
5 ms
%7B%7BLato-Bold-woff
1153 ms
%7B%7BLato-Light-woff
1083 ms
%7B%7BHelveticaNeueLTStd-Bd-ttf
1034 ms
%7B%7BHelveticaNeueLTStd-Md-ttf
963 ms
%7B%7BLato-Light-ttf
1048 ms
%7B%7BLato-Bold-ttf
1001 ms
%7B%7BHelveticaNeueLTStd-Md-svg
1229 ms
%7B%7BHelveticaNeueLTStd-Bd-svg
1139 ms
%7B%7BLato-Light-svg
1524 ms
%7B%7BLato-Bold-svg
1502 ms
ciode.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
No form fields have multiple labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
ciode.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
ciode.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ciode.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ciode.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ciode.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cio De. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: