Tools & Wizards About Us
cirexx.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    42% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

cirexx.com

Cirexx Circuits - PCB Layout - PCB Fabrication - PCB Assembly

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

268 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

482 ms

cirexx.com screenshot

About Website

Visit cirexx.com now to see the best up-to-date Cirexx content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cirexx.com

Looking for printed circuit boards? Trusted since 1980 for PCB Layout, PCB Fabrication & PCB Assembly, all under one roof. We are the Flex Circuit experts.

Visit cirexx.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cirexx.com page load time and found that the first response time was 268 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cirexx.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,130 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.188

65/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.0 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cirexx.com

268 ms

www.cirexx.com

658 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

65 ms

styles.css

120 ms

wordpress_file_upload_style_relaxed.css

177 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Cirexx.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (674 ms) belongs to the original domain Cirexx.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 624.9 kB (37%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cirexx.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 881.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 27.6 kB

  • Original 35.7 kB
  • After minification 33.0 kB
  • After compression 8.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.6 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 881.9 kB
  • After minification 880.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cirexx images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 279.7 kB

  • Original 392.2 kB
  • After minification 347.3 kB
  • After compression 112.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 279.7 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 316.6 kB

  • Original 362.0 kB
  • After minification 324.8 kB
  • After compression 45.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cirexx.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 316.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (49%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

23

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cirexx. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cirexx.com

cirexx.com

268 ms

www.cirexx.com

www.cirexx.com

658 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

65 ms

styles.css

styles.css

120 ms

wordpress_file_upload_style_relaxed.css

wordpress_file_upload_style_relaxed.css

177 ms

wordpress_file_upload_style_safe_relaxed.css

wordpress_file_upload_style_safe_relaxed.css

230 ms

css

css

57 ms

css

css

70 ms

style.css

style.css

232 ms

default.min.css

default.min.css

230 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

269 ms

shortcodes_responsive.css

shortcodes_responsive.css

276 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

392 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

286 ms

json2.js

json2.js

293 ms

wordpress_file_upload_functions.js

wordpress_file_upload_functions.js

311 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

350 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

350 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

331 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

337 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

377 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.js

jquery.magnific-popup.js

440 ms

custom.js

custom.js

465 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

395 ms

style.css

style.css

330 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

292 ms

cirexx-logo.png

cirexx-logo.png

278 ms

State-Sliders50.jpg

State-Sliders50.jpg

526 ms

ECLIPS.jpg

ECLIPS.jpg

426 ms

Flex-Homepage-Sliders50.jpg

Flex-Homepage-Sliders50.jpg

390 ms

srs-Three-Homepage-Sliders50.jpg

srs-Three-Homepage-Sliders50.jpg

433 ms

Relationships-Homepage-Sliders50.jpg

Relationships-Homepage-Sliders50.jpg

423 ms

srs-Challenge-Homepage-Sliders70.jpg

srs-Challenge-Homepage-Sliders70.jpg

487 ms

background-responsiveness.jpg

background-responsiveness.jpg

538 ms

PCB-Design-Block.jpg

PCB-Design-Block.jpg

545 ms

rf-block2.jpg

rf-block2.jpg

534 ms

fleximage_sample_200.jpg

fleximage_sample_200.jpg

538 ms

Assembly-block.jpg

Assembly-block.jpg

596 ms

background-expertise.jpg

background-expertise.jpg

619 ms

w.png

w.png

590 ms

milspec.png

milspec.png

614 ms

itar.png

itar.png

600 ms

iso.png

iso.png

626 ms

as9100.png

as9100.png

647 ms

logo-odb.png

logo-odb.png

656 ms

ipc.member.png

ipc.member.png

674 ms

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

44 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

63 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

84 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

91 ms

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

92 ms

ETmodules_v2.ttf

ETmodules_v2.ttf

597 ms

collect

collect

31 ms

Accessibility Review

cirexx.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

cirexx.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

cirexx.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cirexx.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cirexx.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cirexx.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cirexx. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: