Tools & Wizards About Us
cistory.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 46% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

cistory.org

NameBright - Coming Soon

Page Load Speed

763 ms in total

First Response

86 ms

Resources Loaded

467 ms

Page Rendered

210 ms

cistory.org screenshot

About Website

Visit cistory.org now to see the best up-to-date Cistory content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cistory.org

Visit cistory.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Cistory.org page load time and found that the first response time was 86 ms and then it took 677 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cistory.org performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

35/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

85/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.2 s

86/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cistory.org

86 ms

cisa_background.jpg

394 ms

menu_home.jpg

63 ms

menu_about.jpg

64 ms

menu_projects.jpg

77 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Cistory.org, 11% (2 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com and 11% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (394 ms) belongs to the original domain Cistory.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 520.0 kB (24%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cistory.org main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 9.5 kB
  • After minification 7.7 kB
  • After compression 2.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.7 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.1 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 172.4 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cistory images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 137.9 kB

  • Original 211.1 kB
  • After minification 211.0 kB
  • After compression 73.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 137.9 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 202.6 kB

  • Original 244.2 kB
  • After minification 244.1 kB
  • After compression 41.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cistory.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 202.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cistory. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

cistory.org

cistory.org

86 ms

cisa_background.jpg

cisa_background.jpg

394 ms

menu_home.jpg

menu_home.jpg

63 ms

menu_about.jpg

menu_about.jpg

64 ms

menu_projects.jpg

menu_projects.jpg

77 ms

menu_events.jpg

menu_events.jpg

77 ms

menu_gallery.jpg

menu_gallery.jpg

65 ms

menu_join.jpg

menu_join.jpg

84 ms

menu_contact.jpg

menu_contact.jpg

84 ms

drum%20image%20long.jpg

drum%20image%20long.jpg

106 ms

smallcisa_cd_release_background.jpg

smallcisa_cd_release_background.jpg

120 ms

Banner%20Background.jpg

Banner%20Background.jpg

155 ms

Q9C7f2VqOQg

Q9C7f2VqOQg

97 ms

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css

26 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

41 ms

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

44 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

46 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

63 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

63 ms

Accessibility Review

cistory.org accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

cistory.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

cistory.org SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cistory.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Cistory.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cistory.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cistory. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: