3.1 sec in total
75 ms
1.5 sec
1.5 sec
Visit cito.express now to see the best up-to-date CITO content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cito.express
Order online for Delivery. Here at CITO Gourmet Express | Delicatessen * Kitchen * Coffee - Nicosia you'll experience delicious Gourmet ...
Visit cito.expressWe analyzed Cito.express page load time and found that the first response time was 75 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
cito.express performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value8.5 s
2/100
25%
Value13.0 s
2/100
10%
Value810 ms
36/100
30%
Value0.044
99/100
15%
Value12.8 s
13/100
10%
75 ms
378 ms
46 ms
93 ms
45 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Cito.express, 19% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (723 ms) belongs to the original domain Cito.express.
Page size can be reduced by 242.8 kB (7%)
3.4 MB
3.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Cito.express main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CITO images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 155.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 155.7 kB or 34% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (72%)
67
19
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CITO. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cito.express
75 ms
cito.express
378 ms
font-awesome.min.css
46 ms
css
93 ms
frontend.css
45 ms
style.min.css
36 ms
frontend.min.css
42 ms
frontend.css
29 ms
js_composer.min.css
58 ms
bootstrap.min.css
77 ms
base.min.css
96 ms
v4-shims.min.css
87 ms
all.min.css
82 ms
wp-gutenberg.min.css
82 ms
int-revolution-slider.min.css
111 ms
int-mc4wp.min.css
105 ms
int-wpcf7.min.css
100 ms
int-wpbakery-base.min.css
105 ms
woo-base.min.css
100 ms
header-general.min.css
101 ms
lib-owl-carousel.min.css
107 ms
el-images-gallery.min.css
113 ms
el-section-title.min.css
109 ms
el-menu-price.min.css
109 ms
el-social-icons.min.css
109 ms
footer-general.min.css
110 ms
lib-photoswipe.min.css
117 ms
opt-scrolltotop.min.css
119 ms
basel-dynamic-1727087552.css
120 ms
jquery.min.js
132 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
118 ms
js
103 ms
font-awesome.css
125 ms
woo.css
232 ms
wc-blocks.css
230 ms
tippy.css
223 ms
animate.css
284 ms
rs6.css
280 ms
api.js
102 ms
hooks.min.js
280 ms
vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015
218 ms
opt-cookies-popup.min.css
297 ms
i18n.min.js
297 ms
url.min.js
284 ms
api-fetch.min.js
284 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
281 ms
c7b93502602e2a31856adb48aefcd41b.js
283 ms
embed
206 ms
download.png
88 ms
dummy.png
87 ms
SANDWICHES-AND-SALADS.jpg
87 ms
CITO-WEBSITE-BANNERS-11.jpg
90 ms
CITO-WEBSITE-BANNERS-10-1.jpg
88 ms
DELI.jpg
89 ms
CITO-WEBSITE-BANNERS-13.jpg
94 ms
CITO-WEBSITE-BANNERS-12.jpg
91 ms
CITO-WEBSITE-BANNERS-14.jpg
121 ms
CATERING.jpg
122 ms
CITO-WEBSITE-BANNERS-15.jpg
94 ms
bakery.jpg
95 ms
download-80x80.png
96 ms
stelios-philanthropic-foundation-logo-white-transparent-300x195.png
364 ms
google-play.png
95 ms
app-store.png
120 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXh0ow.ttf
101 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXh0ow.ttf
102 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq_p9WXh0ow.ttf
148 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR9WXh0ow.ttf
162 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R8WXh0ow.ttf
163 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq3p6WXh0ow.ttf
163 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6WXh0ow.ttf
163 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR6WXh0ow.ttf
161 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqw16WXh0ow.ttf
161 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
188 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
187 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
186 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
187 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
188 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
188 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
220 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
218 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
219 ms
Simple-Line-Icons.woff
413 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
492 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
397 ms
basel-font.woff
324 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
407 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
723 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
703 ms
recaptcha__en.js
143 ms
js
123 ms
search.js
7 ms
geometry.js
11 ms
main.js
20 ms
cito.express accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cito.express best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
cito.express SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cito.express can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cito.express main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cito.express
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of CITO. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: