Tools & Wizards About Us
classicasp.site screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

classicasp.site

Classic ASP Support, Development and Maintenance | Classic ASP Support

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

202 ms

Resources Loaded

914 ms

Page Rendered

237 ms

classicasp.site screenshot

About Website

Welcome to classicasp.site homepage info - get ready to check Classic ASP best content right away, or after learning these important things about classicasp.site

Supporting legacy software isn’t something web developers typically like to do. They will often encourage you to rebuild your website, what other options do you have if you run (for example) classic A...

Visit classicasp.site

Key Findings

We analyzed Classicasp.site page load time and found that the first response time was 202 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

classicasp.site performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.1 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,590 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.269

45/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.6 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

classicasp.site

202 ms

classicasp.site

223 ms

style.css

18 ms

styles.css

31 ms

css

42 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Classicasp.site, 13% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (223 ms) belongs to the original domain Classicasp.site.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 45.3 kB (6%)

Content Size

705.8 kB

After Optimization

660.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Classicasp.site main page is 705.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 341.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 37.7 kB

  • Original 47.8 kB
  • After minification 42.3 kB
  • After compression 10.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.4 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 109 B

  • Original 274.3 kB
  • After minification 274.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Classic ASP images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 341.5 kB
  • After minification 341.5 kB
  • After compression 336.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 42.3 kB
  • After minification 42.0 kB
  • After compression 39.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Classicasp.site has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (69%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Classic ASP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

classicasp.site

classicasp.site

202 ms

classicasp.site

classicasp.site

223 ms

style.css

style.css

18 ms

styles.css

styles.css

31 ms

css

css

42 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

43 ms

css

css

58 ms

justifiedGallery.min.css

justifiedGallery.min.css

31 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

28 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

29 ms

style.css

style.css

32 ms

style.css

style.css

35 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

39 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

43 ms

script.js

script.js

41 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

42 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

44 ms

index.js

index.js

44 ms

index.js

index.js

47 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

50 ms

plugins.min.js

plugins.min.js

52 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

88 ms

api.js

api.js

168 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

92 ms

index.js

index.js

91 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

36 ms

Classic-asp-logo.png

Classic-asp-logo.png

77 ms

support-2355701_640.jpg

support-2355701_640.jpg

83 ms

title-divider.png

title-divider.png

18 ms

technology-1587673_640-425x255.jpg

technology-1587673_640-425x255.jpg

83 ms

capri-790722_1920-425x255.jpg

capri-790722_1920-425x255.jpg

77 ms

museum-2203648_1920-425x255.jpg

museum-2203648_1920-425x255.jpg

77 ms

support-1699929_1920-425x255.jpg

support-1699929_1920-425x255.jpg

84 ms

vintage-1216720_1920-425x255.jpg

vintage-1216720_1920-425x255.jpg

81 ms

0QI8MX1D_JOuMw_hLdO6T2wV9KnW-MoFoq92mQ.ttf

0QI8MX1D_JOuMw_hLdO6T2wV9KnW-MoFoq92mQ.ttf

93 ms

0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787weuxJBkqg.ttf

0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787weuxJBkqg.ttf

100 ms

collect

collect

26 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

28 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

28 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

26 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

38 ms

js

js

108 ms

anchor

anchor

38 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

5 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

12 ms

dubcxWuhhbqw8uaLSFFGvELnk5WmffD3wjoYeQZ33gk.js

dubcxWuhhbqw8uaLSFFGvELnk5WmffD3wjoYeQZ33gk.js

35 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

34 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

20 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

37 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

36 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

37 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

46 ms

Accessibility Review

classicasp.site accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

classicasp.site best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

classicasp.site SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Classicasp.site can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Classicasp.site main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

classicasp.site

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Classic ASP. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: