Tools & Wizards About Us
classicenvelope.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

classicenvelope.com

Envelopes, Packaging & Labelling Solutions - SupremeX

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

40 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

416 ms

classicenvelope.com screenshot

About Website

Visit classicenvelope.com now to see the best up-to-date Classicenvelope content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about classicenvelope.com

SupremeX is one of North America's largest Envelope, Packaging and Label manufacturers. With locations coast to coast, we have the solution for you!

Visit classicenvelope.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Classicenvelope.com page load time and found that the first response time was 40 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

classicenvelope.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,530 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.9 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

classicenvelope.com

40 ms

supremex.com

673 ms

style.min.css

60 ms

theme.min.css

132 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

89 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Classicenvelope.com, 92% (67 requests) were made to Supremex.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (673 ms) relates to the external source Supremex.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 422.2 kB (7%)

Content Size

6.1 MB

After Optimization

5.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Classicenvelope.com main page is 6.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 92.1 kB

  • Original 117.9 kB
  • After minification 110.9 kB
  • After compression 25.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 312.5 kB

  • Original 5.6 MB
  • After minification 5.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Classicenvelope images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 227.6 kB
  • After minification 227.6 kB
  • After compression 223.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 13.7 kB

  • Original 106.7 kB
  • After minification 94.0 kB
  • After compression 93.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Classicenvelope.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.7 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (24%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

50

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Classicenvelope. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

classicenvelope.com

classicenvelope.com

40 ms

supremex.com

supremex.com

673 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

60 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

132 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

89 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

90 ms

kingcomposer.min.css

kingcomposer.min.css

95 ms

animate.css

animate.css

91 ms

icons.css

icons.css

97 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

154 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

116 ms

js

js

67 ms

accordion-controls.js

accordion-controls.js

97 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

132 ms

js

js

68 ms

gmaps.js

gmaps.js

109 ms

theme.js

theme.js

188 ms

kingcomposer.min.js

kingcomposer.min.js

132 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

125 ms

envelope-circle.svg

envelope-circle.svg

106 ms

packaging.png

packaging.png

107 ms

HeaderEnvelopes-2.png

HeaderEnvelopes-2.png

109 ms

Product-Line-Up-Labels.png

Product-Line-Up-Labels.png

123 ms

commercialprintthumbnail.png

commercialprintthumbnail.png

108 ms

Tree1.jpg

Tree1.jpg

160 ms

Custom-MIPM-Important-Mail-View-of-both-sides-scaled.jpg

Custom-MIPM-Important-Mail-View-of-both-sides-scaled.jpg

190 ms

BUSINES-ENVELOPE-DIMENSIONS.png

BUSINES-ENVELOPE-DIMENSIONS.png

219 ms

Basics-Logo.jpg

Basics-Logo.jpg

142 ms

Bath-Body-Works-Logo.png

Bath-Body-Works-Logo.png

182 ms

Canada-Pooch-Logo.webp

Canada-Pooch-Logo.webp

150 ms

Canada-Goose-logo.png

Canada-Goose-logo.png

245 ms

CIBC-Logo.jpg

CIBC-Logo.jpg

182 ms

Costco-Logo.png

Costco-Logo.png

191 ms

Craig-envelope-Logo.jpg

Craig-envelope-Logo.jpg

219 ms

Desjardins-Logo.jpg

Desjardins-Logo.jpg

220 ms

Doxim-Logo.png

Doxim-Logo.png

220 ms

Dupli-Logo.png

Dupli-Logo.png

221 ms

Express-Script-Logo-Transparent.png

Express-Script-Logo-Transparent.png

226 ms

Franklin-Creative-Logo.png

Franklin-Creative-Logo.png

237 ms

Fry-Communications-Logo.jpg

Fry-Communications-Logo.jpg

242 ms

Fuji-Film-Logo.png

Fuji-Film-Logo.png

244 ms

Gillette-Logo-Transparent.png

Gillette-Logo-Transparent.png

247 ms

Imperial-Parking-Logo.png

Imperial-Parking-Logo.png

250 ms

Jam-Direct-Logo.png

Jam-Direct-Logo.png

264 ms

Knixwear-Logo.jpg

Knixwear-Logo.jpg

272 ms

Knotty-Knickers-Logo.png

Knotty-Knickers-Logo.png

270 ms

Kubra-Logo.png

Kubra-Logo.png

270 ms

MavPak-Logo.webp

MavPak-Logo.webp

275 ms

Millcraft-Logo.png

Millcraft-Logo.png

273 ms

Novexco-Logo.png

Novexco-Logo.png

291 ms

Pasta-Romana-Logo.png

Pasta-Romana-Logo.png

296 ms

Purolator-Logo.png

Purolator-Logo.png

297 ms

Quad-Graphics-Logo.jpg

Quad-Graphics-Logo.jpg

298 ms

Reitmans-Logo.png

Reitmans-Logo.png

276 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

239 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

235 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

232 ms

ITCFranklinGothicStd-Demi.otf

ITCFranklinGothicStd-Demi.otf

219 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

ITCFranklinGothicStd-Book.otf

ITCFranklinGothicStd-Book.otf

219 ms

Rogers-Logo.png

Rogers-Logo.png

216 ms

js

js

64 ms

Royal-Bank-Logo.png

Royal-Bank-Logo.png

198 ms

SaskTel-logo.png

SaskTel-logo.png

211 ms

Staples-Logo.webp

Staples-Logo.webp

200 ms

TD-Canada-Trust-Logo.png

TD-Canada-Trust-Logo.png

182 ms

Telus-Logo.png

Telus-Logo.png

180 ms

Transcontinental-Logo.png

Transcontinental-Logo.png

171 ms

United_Record_Pressing_Logo.png

United_Record_Pressing_Logo.png

176 ms

Xerox-Logo.png

Xerox-Logo.png

150 ms

Yves-Rocher-Logo.png

Yves-Rocher-Logo.png

160 ms

Prairie-Adveritising-Logo.jpg

Prairie-Adveritising-Logo.jpg

169 ms

cooperators_logo.jpg

cooperators_logo.jpg

192 ms

Accessibility Review

classicenvelope.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role] values are not valid

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

classicenvelope.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

classicenvelope.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Classicenvelope.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Classicenvelope.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

classicenvelope.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Classicenvelope. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: