Tools & Wizards About Us
classicflooring.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

classicflooring.com

Flooring (Carpet, Hardwood, Tile, Rugs) Store Portland ME | Southern Maine | Scarborough, ME

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

8 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

321 ms

classicflooring.com screenshot

About Website

Visit classicflooring.com now to see the best up-to-date Classic Flooring content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about classicflooring.com

Need flooring (carpet, area rugs, ceramic tile,vinyl, hardwood flooring) in Portland ME? Classic Flooring of Southern Maine specializes in flooring and bring to you an extensive collection of Carpet, ...

Visit classicflooring.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Classicflooring.com page load time and found that the first response time was 8 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

classicflooring.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value16.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value610 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.021

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

classicflooring.com

8 ms

classicflooring.com

16 ms

www.classicflooring.com

258 ms

scitylana.min.js

90 ms

main.js

164 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Classicflooring.com, 13% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Dcspg.viziserve.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (29%)

Content Size

5.2 MB

After Optimization

3.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Classicflooring.com main page is 5.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 72.8 kB

  • Original 91.8 kB
  • After minification 87.0 kB
  • After compression 19.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 36.3 kB

  • Original 2.9 MB
  • After minification 2.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Classic Flooring images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB
  • After compression 784.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 148.1 kB

  • Original 172.8 kB
  • After minification 141.4 kB
  • After compression 24.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Classicflooring.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 148.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (66%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Classic Flooring. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

classicflooring.com

classicflooring.com

8 ms

classicflooring.com

classicflooring.com

16 ms

www.classicflooring.com

www.classicflooring.com

258 ms

scitylana.min.js

scitylana.min.js

90 ms

main.js

main.js

164 ms

dcspg-site.min.css

dcspg-site.min.css

87 ms

dcspg-catalog.min.css

dcspg-catalog.min.css

65 ms

dcspg-viz.min.css

dcspg-viz.min.css

69 ms

magnify.min.css

magnify.min.css

38 ms

css

css

60 ms

css

css

50 ms

fancybox

fancybox

38 ms

style.css

style.css

105 ms

jquery

jquery

105 ms

VisualizerPluginAll-min.js

VisualizerPluginAll-min.js

1049 ms

jquery.dcspg.viz.js

jquery.dcspg.viz.js

79 ms

jsapi

jsapi

52 ms

api.js

api.js

72 ms

pinit.js

pinit.js

49 ms

style.css

style.css

136 ms

wowslider.js

wowslider.js

137 ms

script.js

script.js

136 ms

ClassicFlooring.js

ClassicFlooring.js

58 ms

fancybox

fancybox

137 ms

dcspg

dcspg

150 ms

loader.js

loader.js

17 ms

integrations-b2f0726e42373459e2a4da02161a0d25a5f96506.min.js

integrations-b2f0726e42373459e2a4da02161a0d25a5f96506.min.js

19 ms

css

css

52 ms

css

css

98 ms

css

css

98 ms

css

css

99 ms

css

css

99 ms

css

css

100 ms

css

css

99 ms

css

css

100 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

106 ms

vendors~traffic-source-tracking.39572620.js

vendors~traffic-source-tracking.39572620.js

75 ms

traffic-source-tracking.0be7d22b.js

traffic-source-tracking.0be7d22b.js

134 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

60 ms

classic-flooring-logo.jpg

classic-flooring-logo.jpg

118 ms

button-point-down.png

button-point-down.png

108 ms

hmslide1.jpg

hmslide1.jpg

169 ms

hmslide2.jpg

hmslide2.jpg

170 ms

hmslide3.jpg

hmslide3.jpg

188 ms

hmslide4.jpg

hmslide4.jpg

169 ms

hmslide5.jpg

hmslide5.jpg

200 ms

hmbtns1.jpg

hmbtns1.jpg

183 ms

hmbtns2.jpg

hmbtns2.jpg

282 ms

hmbtns3.jpg

hmbtns3.jpg

283 ms

hmbtns4.jpg

hmbtns4.jpg

283 ms

hmbtns5.jpg

hmbtns5.jpg

282 ms

hmbtns6.jpg

hmbtns6.jpg

285 ms

broadlume-bl-200px.png

broadlume-bl-200px.png

281 ms

home_dark.png

home_dark.png

99 ms

css

css

26 ms

pinit_main.js

pinit_main.js

8 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

43 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

43 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

266 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

280 ms

fa-light-300.woff

fa-light-300.woff

286 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

71 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff

73 ms

-F6xfjBsISg9aMakPm3wpQ.woff

-F6xfjBsISg9aMakPm3wpQ.woff

82 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

269 ms

collect

collect

90 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

29 ms

js

js

57 ms

Accessibility Review

classicflooring.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

classicflooring.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

classicflooring.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Classicflooring.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Classicflooring.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

classicflooring.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Classic Flooring. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: