2.1 sec in total
289 ms
1.6 sec
217 ms
Welcome to classicphotos.net homepage info - get ready to check Classicphotos best content right away, or after learning these important things about classicphotos.net
This website is for sale! classicphotos.net is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, classicphoto...
Visit classicphotos.netWe analyzed Classicphotos.net page load time and found that the first response time was 289 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
classicphotos.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0.8 s
100/100
25%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
Value290 ms
79/100
30%
Value0.212
59/100
15%
Value3.2 s
94/100
10%
289 ms
194 ms
56 ms
39 ms
59 ms
Our browser made a total of 124 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Classicphotos.net, 10% (12 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 7% (9 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (324 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.
Page size can be reduced by 709.5 kB (67%)
1.1 MB
342.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Classicphotos.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 815.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.5 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Classicphotos needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 540.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 540.2 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 130.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Classicphotos.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 130.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 77 (75%)
102
25
The browser has sent 102 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Classicphotos. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
classicphotos.net
289 ms
monetate.js
194 ms
application.css
56 ms
ng-modal.css
39 ms
angular.min.js
59 ms
ng-modal.js
41 ms
google_analytics.js
40 ms
google_oauth.js
39 ms
bold_chat.js
52 ms
eloqua.js
51 ms
hotjar.js
51 ms
adroll.js
50 ms
impactRadius.js
56 ms
in.js
65 ms
api.js
69 ms
api:client.js
90 ms
app.js
46 ms
cookies.js
47 ms
socialMedia.js
46 ms
countryDropdown.js
49 ms
monetate.js
50 ms
index.js
51 ms
lander.js
47 ms
seoPages.js
51 ms
sitePages.js
50 ms
search.js
50 ms
modal.js
50 ms
forms.js
50 ms
tldSelector.js
49 ms
setFixedTop.js
51 ms
searchBar.js
51 ms
currency.js
52 ms
trust.js
52 ms
conversion.js
62 ms
tdfs-inner.css
51 ms
tdfs-temp.css
50 ms
thankyou.css
53 ms
entry.js
4 ms
css
24 ms
fontawesome.min.css
12 ms
bd-icons.min.css
13 ms
ga.js
101 ms
foundation-A136666-2811-40ba-bff2-3df3af8bc2ae1.min.js
102 ms
userspace
280 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
215 ms
recaptcha__en.js
298 ms
all.js
94 ms
324 ms
logo-header-2x.png
88 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
231 ms
288 ms
hotjar-10205.js
204 ms
elqCfg.min.js
195 ms
bg-main-hilight-fade.jpg
176 ms
bg-select.png
176 ms
bg-target-bd-icon.png
175 ms
__utm.gif
176 ms
foundation-tags-SD780-3f5b-4f28-957f-6e6dc25a7fc41.min.js
108 ms
__utm.gif
129 ms
__utm.gif
141 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
115 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
127 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
170 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
169 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
126 ms
189 ms
postmessageRelay
144 ms
xd_arbiter.php
82 ms
xd_arbiter.php
129 ms
svrGP
132 ms
framework
78 ms
modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js
149 ms
iframe
144 ms
fallback
81 ms
141 ms
collect
180 ms
fallback__ltr.css
8 ms
payload
82 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
84 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
63 ms
css
110 ms
1233565733-idpiframe.js
62 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
15 ms
iframerpc
44 ms
logo_48.png
4 ms
refresh.png
2 ms
audio.png
4 ms
vms.js
76 ms
roundtrip.js
18 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
57 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
83 ms
xd_arbiter.php
18 ms
542IK7HHBBFJJFENPFA7WX.js
33 ms
bc.pv
95 ms
fbevents.hashing.js
13 ms
out
9 ms
53 ms
23 ms
44 ms
out
15 ms
out
14 ms
out
23 ms
out
14 ms
out
22 ms
out
23 ms
out
39 ms
out
39 ms
31 ms
adsct
94 ms
u.php
46 ms
30 ms
sync
30 ms
pixel
50 ms
29 ms
377928.gif
23 ms
sd
13 ms
bounce
28 ms
u.php
23 ms
u.php
15 ms
u.php
23 ms
u.php
15 ms
u.php
14 ms
in
4 ms
tap.php
15 ms
classicphotos.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
classicphotos.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
classicphotos.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Classicphotos.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Classicphotos.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
classicphotos.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Classicphotos. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: