Tools & Wizards About Us
classicrockrevisited.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

classicrockrevisited.com

Classic Rock Revisited your online source for Rock and Metal fans

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

92 ms

Resources Loaded

954 ms

Page Rendered

153 ms

classicrockrevisited.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to classicrockrevisited.com homepage info - get ready to check Classic Rock Revisited best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about classicrockrevisited.com

Classic Rock Revisited your online source for classic rock and classic metal. Interviews, cd and dvd reviews, concert coverage, current news, community, and rock shop band merchandise.

Visit classicrockrevisited.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Classicrockrevisited.com page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

classicrockrevisited.com performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

96/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

77/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

46/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,060 ms

25/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.063

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.4 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

classicrockrevisited.com

92 ms

coolMenu.css

24 ms

960.css

40 ms

jquery-latest.pack.js

58 ms

jcarousellite_1.0.1c4.js

41 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Classicrockrevisited.com, 13% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (163 ms) relates to the external source Static.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 61.4 kB (8%)

Content Size

800.6 kB

After Optimization

739.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Classicrockrevisited.com main page is 800.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 486.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 20.2 kB

  • Original 24.1 kB
  • After minification 20.1 kB
  • After compression 3.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.0 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 486.0 kB
  • After minification 479.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Classic Rock Revisited images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 34.1 kB

  • Original 230.8 kB
  • After minification 230.6 kB
  • After compression 196.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 34.1 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 190 B

  • Original 59.6 kB
  • After minification 59.6 kB
  • After compression 59.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Classicrockrevisited.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (19%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Classic Rock Revisited. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

classicrockrevisited.com

classicrockrevisited.com

92 ms

coolMenu.css

coolMenu.css

24 ms

960.css

960.css

40 ms

jquery-latest.pack.js

jquery-latest.pack.js

58 ms

jcarousellite_1.0.1c4.js

jcarousellite_1.0.1c4.js

41 ms

ga.js

ga.js

45 ms

image-755222-10690930

image-755222-10690930

44 ms

crr.jpg

crr.jpg

52 ms

TDD-468x60-2018-NEWanimate.gif

TDD-468x60-2018-NEWanimate.gif

36 ms

4.gif

4.gif

89 ms

RS_VLU_Bnnr_728x90%4072dpi.gif

RS_VLU_Bnnr_728x90%4072dpi.gif

51 ms

FRGNR_LATR78_Bnnr_728x90%4072dpi_v3.gif

FRGNR_LATR78_Bnnr_728x90%4072dpi_v3.gif

57 ms

facebook2.jpg

facebook2.jpg

37 ms

twitter2.jpg

twitter2.jpg

57 ms

CRACKTHE%20SKY.jpg

CRACKTHE%20SKY.jpg

71 ms

facebook-logo.png

facebook-logo.png

69 ms

frankhannon%20(100x100).jpg

frankhannon%20(100x100).jpg

72 ms

steveamsll%20(100x100).jpg

steveamsll%20(100x100).jpg

78 ms

images%20(100x100).jpg

images%20(100x100).jpg

79 ms

carlsmall%20(100x100).jpg

carlsmall%20(100x100).jpg

87 ms

front%20(100x100).jpg

front%20(100x100).jpg

109 ms

toby%20(100x100).jpg

toby%20(100x100).jpg

94 ms

findme%20(100x100).jpg

findme%20(100x100).jpg

100 ms

BenOrrCover1%20(100x100).jpg

BenOrrCover1%20(100x100).jpg

107 ms

earl%20(100x100).jpg

earl%20(100x100).jpg

108 ms

kix2.jpg

kix2.jpg

108 ms

kix1.jpg

kix1.jpg

114 ms

ne6uKG6TJrw

ne6uKG6TJrw

120 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

14 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

8 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

34 ms

base.js

base.js

61 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

163 ms

LvMrC3vzHFP8SzxjvqNWRksbkOPiJTf11ILX4Pq8Ybc.js

LvMrC3vzHFP8SzxjvqNWRksbkOPiJTf11ILX4Pq8Ybc.js

103 ms

embed.js

embed.js

32 ms

id

id

30 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

119 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

120 ms

Create

Create

108 ms

Accessibility Review

classicrockrevisited.com accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

classicrockrevisited.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

classicrockrevisited.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Classicrockrevisited.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Classicrockrevisited.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

classicrockrevisited.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Classic Rock Revisited. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: