Tools & Wizards About Us
classicscreenprinting.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 90

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

classicscreenprinting.com

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

589 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

207 ms

classicscreenprinting.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Classicscreenprinting content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about classicscreenprinting.com

Classic Screen Printing

Visit classicscreenprinting.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Classicscreenprinting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 589 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

classicscreenprinting.com performance score

90

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

71/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.7 s

90/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

password

589 ms

preloads.js

80 ms

load_feature-1060834584ef204397b1179782a1b090047ee4397cb627244ab89e03f65c4307.js

83 ms

section-password.css

44 ms

base.css

53 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Classicscreenprinting.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (589 ms) belongs to the original domain Classicscreenprinting.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 52.0 kB (17%)

Content Size

305.9 kB

After Optimization

253.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Classicscreenprinting.com main page is 305.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 176.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 45.5 kB

  • Original 61.5 kB
  • After minification 60.6 kB
  • After compression 16.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 176.0 kB
  • After minification 172.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Classicscreenprinting images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 51 B

  • Original 48.6 kB
  • After minification 48.6 kB
  • After compression 48.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 19.8 kB
  • After minification 19.8 kB
  • After compression 16.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Classicscreenprinting.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.0 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (78%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Classicscreenprinting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

password

password

589 ms

preloads.js

preloads.js

80 ms

load_feature-1060834584ef204397b1179782a1b090047ee4397cb627244ab89e03f65c4307.js

load_feature-1060834584ef204397b1179782a1b090047ee4397cb627244ab89e03f65c4307.js

83 ms

section-password.css

section-password.css

44 ms

base.css

base.css

53 ms

component-list-social.css

component-list-social.css

48 ms

global.js

global.js

68 ms

details-modal.js

details-modal.js

69 ms

password-modal.js

password-modal.js

83 ms

shopify-perf-kit-1.0.1.min.js

shopify-perf-kit-1.0.1.min.js

59 ms

section-image-banner.css

section-image-banner.css

92 ms

component-newsletter.css

component-newsletter.css

77 ms

newsletter-section.css

newsletter-section.css

79 ms

section-email-signup-banner.css

section-email-signup-banner.css

93 ms

section-contact-form.css

section-contact-form.css

86 ms

trekkie.storefront.bb32418b94c37354e44146cb43d02fd63a44aac1.min.js

trekkie.storefront.bb32418b94c37354e44146cb43d02fd63a44aac1.min.js

46 ms

shop_events_listener-61fa9e0a912c675e178777d2b27f6cbd482f8912a6b0aa31fa3515985a8cd626.js

shop_events_listener-61fa9e0a912c675e178777d2b27f6cbd482f8912a6b0aa31fa3515985a8cd626.js

62 ms

Classic_Sanmar_Site_1.png

Classic_Sanmar_Site_1.png

380 ms

Stitch_Outs.jpg

Stitch_Outs.jpg

438 ms

Accessibility Review

classicscreenprinting.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

classicscreenprinting.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

classicscreenprinting.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Classicscreenprinting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Classicscreenprinting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

classicscreenprinting.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Classicscreenprinting. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: