5.1 sec in total
970 ms
4 sec
195 ms
Welcome to clayburn.wtf homepage info - get ready to check Clayburn best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about clayburn.wtf
This is the official web log of Clayburn Griffin. Come enjoy his ramblings and thoughts Internet form.
Visit clayburn.wtfWe analyzed Clayburn.wtf page load time and found that the first response time was 970 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
clayburn.wtf performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
33/100
10%
Value3.7 s
59/100
25%
Value9.1 s
14/100
10%
Value2,090 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.196
63/100
15%
Value16.8 s
5/100
10%
970 ms
147 ms
127 ms
136 ms
204 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 31% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Clayburn.wtf, 13% (9 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 13% (9 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (971 ms) relates to the external source Developers.google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 174.1 kB (23%)
765.7 kB
591.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Clayburn.wtf main page is 765.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 495.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.5 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 58.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Clayburn needs image optimization as it can save up to 58.2 kB or 38% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 46.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 13.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clayburn.wtf needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.3 kB or 31% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (65%)
62
22
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clayburn. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.clayburn.wtf
970 ms
style.min.css
147 ms
form-basic.css
127 ms
style.css
136 ms
jquery.min.js
204 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
129 ms
common-scripts.js
130 ms
adsbygoogle.js
240 ms
comment_count.js
142 ms
frontend.min.js
150 ms
script.js
143 ms
forms.js
147 ms
analytics.js
23 ms
cm
85 ms
count.js
114 ms
wtf-sprite.png
108 ms
hillary-clinton-crazy-eyes-150x150.png
399 ms
edith-wedding-150x150.jpg
341 ms
vote-150x150.jpg
341 ms
Bible-Reading-150x150.jpg
340 ms
satin-dolls-150x150.jpg
339 ms
frame1-150x150.png
398 ms
41139_128115210568302_6162522_n-150x150.jpg
418 ms
150px-at.svg_.png
419 ms
sprite.png
107 ms
platform.js
137 ms
all.js
120 ms
widgets.js
119 ms
widgets.js
136 ms
collect
140 ms
widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html
34 ms
all.js
33 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
44 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
66 ms
fastbutton
57 ms
follow
55 ms
subscribe_embed
108 ms
settings
199 ms
js
92 ms
66 ms
postmessageRelay
119 ms
developers.google.com
822 ms
www-subscribe-embed_split_v0.css
62 ms
www-subscribe-embed_v0.js
87 ms
subscribe_button_branded_lozenge.png
38 ms
3636781319-postmessagerelay.js
39 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
27 ms
developers.google.com
971 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
13 ms
button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js
24 ms
tweet.d7aeb21a88e025d2ea5f5431a103f586.js
23 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
19 ms
embeds
33 ms
follow_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html
13 ms
Tweet.html
14 ms
embed.runtime.d4fdbaa43d8afce29068.js
5 ms
embed.9449.78398904051446294e3d.js
10 ms
embed.Tweet.02ab0848482b3e69ec95.js
6 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_2
8 ms
border_3.gif
4 ms
subscribe_embed
43 ms
spacer.gif
4 ms
border_3.gif
8 ms
bubbleSprite_3.png
12 ms
bubbleDropR_3.png
13 ms
bubbleDropB_3.png
15 ms
www-subscribe-embed-card_v0.css
4 ms
www-subscribe-embed-card_v0.js
7 ms
clayburn.wtf accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
clayburn.wtf best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
clayburn.wtf SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clayburn.wtf can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Clayburn.wtf main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
clayburn.wtf
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Clayburn. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: