2 sec in total
252 ms
1.5 sec
273 ms
Visit claytonadvocate.com now to see the best up-to-date Claytonadvocate content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about claytonadvocate.com
Visit claytonadvocate.comWe analyzed Claytonadvocate.com page load time and found that the first response time was 252 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
claytonadvocate.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0
0/100
10%
Value0
0/100
25%
Value0
0/100
10%
Value0
0/100
30%
Value0.086
93/100
15%
Value0
0/100
10%
252 ms
495 ms
90 ms
169 ms
158 ms
Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Claytonadvocate.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (556 ms) belongs to the original domain Claytonadvocate.com.
Page size can be reduced by 156.2 kB (38%)
414.7 kB
258.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Claytonadvocate.com main page is 414.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 271.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Claytonadvocate needs image optimization as it can save up to 37.8 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 41.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 41.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 51.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Claytonadvocate.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 51.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (61%)
18
7
The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Claytonadvocate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
claytonadvocate.com
252 ms
index.php
495 ms
index.css
90 ms
script.js
169 ms
theme.js
158 ms
backdrop.png
97 ms
main_block.png
556 ms
upshrink.png
80 ms
submit_bg.png
84 ms
upshrink2.png
161 ms
menu_gfx.png
260 ms
frame_repeat.png
160 ms
off.png
169 ms
new_none.png
175 ms
new_redirect.png
243 ms
collapse.gif
241 ms
xx.gif
248 ms
info.gif
253 ms
online.gif
317 ms
expand.gif
322 ms
claytonadvocate.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
claytonadvocate.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Uses deprecated APIs
Page has valid source maps
claytonadvocate.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Claytonadvocate.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Claytonadvocate.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
claytonadvocate.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Claytonadvocate. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: