Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 54

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

clean-lines.com

Index of /

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

217 ms

clean-lines.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Clean Lines content for Australia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about clean-lines.com

Clean Lines Web Development Byron Bay specialises in Joomla, Magento, Wordpress, Open-source CMS customisation SEO, online and social media marketing.

Visit clean-lines.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Clean-lines.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

clean-lines.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.3 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.1 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,940 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.173

69/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.3 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

clean-lines.com

1341 ms

ga.js

26 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

115 ms

style.css

224 ms

css

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Clean-lines.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Clean-lines.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (80%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

546.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Clean-lines.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 84.6 kB

  • Original 104.5 kB
  • After minification 101.2 kB
  • After compression 19.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 15.7 kB

  • Original 147.3 kB
  • After minification 131.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Clean Lines needs image optimization as it can save up to 15.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 608.4 kB

  • Original 845.3 kB
  • After minification 786.5 kB
  • After compression 236.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 608.4 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 1.5 MB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB
  • After compression 157.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clean-lines.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 90% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (64%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

24

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clean Lines. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

clean-lines.com accessibility score

54

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

SEO Factors

clean-lines.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clean-lines.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Clean-lines.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Clean Lines. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: