Tools & Wizards About Us
clean.cloud screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

clean.cloud

Laundry and Dry Cleaning Pickup and Delivery | CleanCloud

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

59 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

379 ms

clean.cloud screenshot

About Website

Welcome to clean.cloud homepage info - get ready to check Clean best content right away, or after learning these important things about clean.cloud

Find your nearest pickup and delivery dry cleaning or laundry service with CleanCloud. The number 1 platform supporting your local dry cleaners and laundries.

Visit clean.cloud

Key Findings

We analyzed Clean.cloud page load time and found that the first response time was 59 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

clean.cloud performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.6 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value400 ms

68/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.7 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

clean.cloud

59 ms

clean.cloud

226 ms

style.css

59 ms

responsive.css

38 ms

js

79 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Clean.cloud, 29% (15 requests) were made to S3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com and 10% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (613 ms) relates to the external source S3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (54%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Clean.cloud main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 73.0 kB

  • Original 81.3 kB
  • After minification 60.8 kB
  • After compression 8.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.5 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.0 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 66.4 kB

  • Original 697.5 kB
  • After minification 631.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Clean images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 977.4 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB
  • After compression 523.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 977.4 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 317.8 kB

  • Original 372.6 kB
  • After minification 351.2 kB
  • After compression 54.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clean.cloud needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 317.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (37%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clean. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

clean.cloud

clean.cloud

59 ms

clean.cloud

clean.cloud

226 ms

style.css

style.css

59 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

38 ms

js

js

79 ms

css

css

69 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

73 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

64 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

84 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

95 ms

aos.css

aos.css

86 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

84 ms

slick.css

slick.css

84 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

87 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

122 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

23 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

120 ms

plugins.min.js

plugins.min.js

140 ms

active.js

active.js

119 ms

CleanCloud_Logo.svg

CleanCloud_Logo.svg

428 ms

129591587144898.png

129591587144898.png

417 ms

cc96.png

cc96.png

530 ms

app-store-black.png

app-store-black.png

95 ms

google-play-black.png

google-play-black.png

95 ms

hero-image-6.png

hero-image-6.png

405 ms

download.png

download.png

95 ms

settings.png

settings.png

94 ms

app.png

app.png

94 ms

map.png

map.png

414 ms

295381706033759.jpeg

295381706033759.jpeg

531 ms

271451689333337.png

271451689333337.png

530 ms

167111645317922.gif

167111645317922.gif

530 ms

157471611053180.png

157471611053180.png

532 ms

241361661808039.jpg

241361661808039.jpg

530 ms

40961612894495.jpg

40961612894495.jpg

487 ms

288301700306622.png

288301700306622.png

531 ms

72911568994304.png

72911568994304.png

569 ms

146591611053788.png

146591611053788.png

608 ms

your-cleaners-online.png

your-cleaners-online.png

607 ms

160651609602407.png

160651609602407.png

608 ms

48061623225840.png

48061623225840.png

569 ms

190271629140777.jpg

190271629140777.jpg

605 ms

932.png

932.png

613 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

391 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

392 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

434 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

472 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

473 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

348 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

322 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

389 ms

Accessibility Review

clean.cloud accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

clean.cloud best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

clean.cloud SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clean.cloud can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Clean.cloud main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

clean.cloud

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Clean. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: