2.4 sec in total
239 ms
2 sec
201 ms
Visit cleaningblock.com now to see the best up-to-date Cleaning Block content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cleaningblock.com
The ecological and powerful cleaning tool made from recycled materials. Cleaning block gets rid of the most encrusted dirt with no effort!
Visit cleaningblock.comWe analyzed Cleaningblock.com page load time and found that the first response time was 239 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
cleaningblock.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
63/100
10%
Value2.7 s
86/100
25%
Value3.8 s
84/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.812
4/100
15%
Value2.6 s
98/100
10%
239 ms
638 ms
225 ms
342 ms
33 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Cleaningblock.com, 42% (31 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (720 ms) belongs to the original domain Cleaningblock.com.
Page size can be reduced by 355.3 kB (39%)
907.0 kB
551.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Cleaningblock.com main page is 907.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 385.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 133.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 133.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 186 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cleaning Block images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 221.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 221.4 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cleaningblock.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (28%)
39
28
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cleaning Block. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cleaningblock.com
239 ms
cleaningblock.com
638 ms
testimonial-rotator-style.css
225 ms
font-awesome.min.css
342 ms
css
33 ms
wprevpro_w3.css
253 ms
et-divi-customizer-global.min.css
229 ms
lazyload.min.js
350 ms
Cleaning-Block-Stick-1.jpg
692 ms
CleaningBlockGrill.jpg
611 ms
Cleaning-Block-POOL.jpg
608 ms
Cleaning-Block-WC-reflex.jpg
608 ms
Cleaning-Block-Griddle.jpg
686 ms
question-icon.png
715 ms
chemical-free-icon-1.png
716 ms
eco-friendly-leaves.png
716 ms
effective-icon-WC-1.png
720 ms
CB-logo-.jpg
130 ms
Logo-CB-.jpg
116 ms
products-cleaning-block-wc.jpg
368 ms
hover-prueba.jpg
481 ms
produkte-cleaning-block-pool.jpg
481 ms
productos-cleaning-block-stick.jpg
481 ms
productos-Cleaning-Block-Griddle.jpg
465 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHvxk.ttf
33 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USew8.ttf
34 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30wWw.ttf
34 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVew8.ttf
34 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50Xew8.ttf
29 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf
43 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf
52 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf
44 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgWxP.ttf
54 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf
65 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf
53 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-.ttf
52 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf
53 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-.ttf
66 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew-.ttf
66 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw-.ttf
75 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-.ttf
75 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf
75 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w-.ttf
75 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w-.ttf
79 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pYCP.ttf
89 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapYCP.ttf
89 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpYCP.ttf
89 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpYCP.ttf
90 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoooCP.ttf
89 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaooCP.ttf
91 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEooCP.ttf
91 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaooCP.ttf
91 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao4CP.ttf
91 ms
modules.woff
413 ms
EqEw5a5Ie44
112 ms
Catalogue-cover.jpg
401 ms
Ecofriendly-icon.jpg
605 ms
Extra-strong-icon.jpg
526 ms
chemical-free-icon.jpg
527 ms
hypoallergenic-icon.jpg
526 ms
odorless-icon.jpg
527 ms
www-player.css
7 ms
www-embed-player.js
26 ms
base.js
48 ms
ad_status.js
160 ms
xmnuRLFIB2aI6qbGS483SdTuOq1a1O-XNl-4_rBMxeo.js
111 ms
embed.js
42 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
16 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
17 ms
Create
75 ms
id
72 ms
style.min.css
120 ms
GenerateIT
15 ms
cleaningblock.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cleaningblock.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
cleaningblock.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cleaningblock.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cleaningblock.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cleaningblock.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cleaning Block. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: