5.3 sec in total
1.1 sec
4.1 sec
101 ms
Click here to check amazing Clemence Richard content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about clemencerichard.lt
Visit clemencerichard.ltWe analyzed Clemencerichard.lt page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
clemencerichard.lt performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value8.2 s
2/100
25%
Value11.1 s
6/100
10%
Value80 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.176
68/100
15%
Value8.0 s
43/100
10%
1122 ms
122 ms
234 ms
335 ms
339 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Clemencerichard.lt, 22% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Clemencerichard.com.
Page size can be reduced by 130.5 kB (30%)
441.5 kB
311.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Clemencerichard.lt main page is 441.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 165.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 115.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Clemence Richard needs image optimization as it can save up to 14.9 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 93 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 355 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clemencerichard.lt has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (94%)
48
3
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clemence Richard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
1122 ms
main.min.css
122 ms
styles.css
234 ms
contact-form-7-main.min.css
335 ms
woocommerce-layout-grid.min.css
339 ms
woocommerce-grid.min.css
351 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
360 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
477 ms
swiper.min.css
362 ms
post-5.css
443 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
448 ms
global.css
467 ms
post-6.css
479 ms
post-78.css
480 ms
post-784.css
554 ms
front.min.css
576 ms
css
28 ms
fontawesome.min.css
584 ms
solid.min.css
593 ms
regular.min.css
596 ms
brands.min.css
598 ms
jquery.min.js
778 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
687 ms
front.min.js
700 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
712 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
715 ms
frontend.min.js
716 ms
index.js
863 ms
index.js
863 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
864 ms
js.cookie.min.js
865 ms
woocommerce.min.js
865 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
902 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
913 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
938 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
953 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1077 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
957 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
906 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
919 ms
hooks.min.js
725 ms
i18n.min.js
740 ms
frontend.min.js
734 ms
waypoints.min.js
775 ms
core.min.js
812 ms
frontend.min.js
754 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
758 ms
logo-tuscias.png
629 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
40 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
46 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
46 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff
47 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
46 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff
59 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
480 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
384 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K3vXBi8JoA.woff
58 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nXBi8JoA.woff
59 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32KxfXBi8JoA.woff
59 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K8nXBi8JoA.woff
60 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nWBi8JoA.woff
60 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K5fQBi8JoA.woff
59 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K67QBi8JoA.woff
60 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K8nQBi8JoA.woff
60 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K-DQBi8JoA.woff
60 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
530 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen-grid.min.css
118 ms
clemencerichard.lt accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
clemencerichard.lt best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
clemencerichard.lt SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
LT
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clemencerichard.lt can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Lithuanian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Clemencerichard.lt main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
clemencerichard.lt
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Clemence Richard. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: