1.7 sec in total
153 ms
1.3 sec
227 ms
Visit clickback.com now to see the best up-to-date Clickback content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about clickback.com
Our two powerful B2B lead generation software solutions allow you to aggressively increase the growth of your revenue and leads. See a free trial or demo of either product. Or, give us a call to find ...
Visit clickback.comWe analyzed Clickback.com page load time and found that the first response time was 153 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
clickback.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.0 s
0/100
10%
Value9.2 s
1/100
25%
Value9.4 s
12/100
10%
Value1,600 ms
12/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value18.2 s
3/100
10%
153 ms
312 ms
209 ms
24 ms
122 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Clickback.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (424 ms) belongs to the original domain Clickback.com.
Page size can be reduced by 382.0 kB (39%)
977.9 kB
596.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Clickback.com main page is 977.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 440.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.1 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Clickback images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 268.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 268.1 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 69.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clickback.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 69.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (37%)
52
33
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clickback. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
clickback.com
153 ms
www.clickback.com
312 ms
3710882646.js
209 ms
css
24 ms
screen.css
122 ms
mobile.css
167 ms
jquery.placeholder.min.css
110 ms
responsiveslides.css
110 ms
jquery.min.js
87 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
116 ms
jquery.selectric.min.js
160 ms
jquery.placeholder.min.js
115 ms
general.js
158 ms
responsiveslides.min.js
160 ms
jquery.mmenu.min.all.js
268 ms
jquery.mmenu.all.css
195 ms
conversion.js
37 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
47 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
47 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
117 ms
print.css
118 ms
dc.js
42 ms
858557.js
127 ms
clickback_logo2.png
161 ms
search.png
121 ms
header_facebook.png
120 ms
header_twitter.png
119 ms
header_linkedin.png
119 ms
header_googleplus.png
119 ms
email-lead-generation-slider-image-1v2.jpg
337 ms
clients-bg.jpg
383 ms
basics.png
185 ms
conservative.png
184 ms
kangurulogo.png
184 ms
CDI_Managed_Services_Logo.png
208 ms
LexisNexis2.png
244 ms
machalek.png
243 ms
mti_education.png
241 ms
home-content-bg.png
267 ms
quote-open.png
299 ms
quote-close.png
300 ms
feature_smarter.png
298 ms
flag-button-orange-bg.png
313 ms
feature_elg.png
360 ms
feature_sales.png
365 ms
feature_partner.png
367 ms
footer_linkedin.png
368 ms
footer_facebook.png
386 ms
footer_twitter.png
421 ms
90 ms
plusone.js
170 ms
__utm.gif
19 ms
email-lead-generation-slider-image-2v2.jpg
424 ms
email-lead-generation-slider-image-3v2.jpg
424 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
30 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxi8cqLH4MEiSE0ROcU-qHOA.ttf
28 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxp_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
53 ms
51 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
26 ms
tracking.js
82 ms
__ptq.gif
19 ms
clickback.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
clickback.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
clickback.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clickback.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Clickback.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
clickback.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Clickback. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: