Tools & Wizards About Us
clickclaims.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

clickclaims.com

ClickClaims Claims Management for P&C Insurance Carrier, IA Firms, Third Party Administrator – ClickClaims Claims Management Solutions

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

533 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

575 ms

clickclaims.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to clickclaims.com homepage info - get ready to check Click Claims best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about clickclaims.com

ClickClaims is a Saas Claims Management Solution for P&C Insurance Carriers, IA Firms, Third Party Adminstrators and Specialty Providers.

Visit clickclaims.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Clickclaims.com page load time and found that the first response time was 533 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

clickclaims.com performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value23.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value23,200 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.141

78/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value36.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

clickclaims.com

533 ms

bootstrap.css

79 ms

bootstrap-theme.css

77 ms

main.css

87 ms

modernizr-2.6.2-respond-1.1.0.min.js

76 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Clickclaims.com, 11% (4 requests) were made to Google.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (533 ms) belongs to the original domain Clickclaims.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 566.3 kB (46%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

663.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Clickclaims.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 450.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 37.4 kB

  • Original 44.9 kB
  • After minification 30.5 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.3 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 61.4 kB

  • Original 450.9 kB
  • After minification 389.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Click Claims needs image optimization as it can save up to 61.4 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 277.7 kB

  • Original 430.9 kB
  • After minification 423.9 kB
  • After compression 153.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 277.7 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 189.8 kB

  • Original 303.3 kB
  • After minification 271.5 kB
  • After compression 113.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clickclaims.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 189.8 kB or 63% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (42%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Click Claims. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

clickclaims.com

clickclaims.com

533 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

79 ms

bootstrap-theme.css

bootstrap-theme.css

77 ms

main.css

main.css

87 ms

modernizr-2.6.2-respond-1.1.0.min.js

modernizr-2.6.2-respond-1.1.0.min.js

76 ms

jquery-1.10.1.min.js

jquery-1.10.1.min.js

121 ms

api.js

api.js

41 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

111 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

112 ms

main.js

main.js

112 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

124 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

79 ms

main_logo.png

main_logo.png

56 ms

button_arrow.png

button_arrow.png

53 ms

choice_a.jpg

choice_a.jpg

141 ms

arrow_up.png

arrow_up.png

52 ms

choice_b.jpg

choice_b.jpg

79 ms

choice_c.jpg

choice_c.jpg

77 ms

bg_a.jpg

bg_a.jpg

243 ms

graphic_a.png

graphic_a.png

78 ms

bg_b.jpg

bg_b.jpg

244 ms

graphic_b.png

graphic_b.png

139 ms

graphic_c.png

graphic_c.png

219 ms

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

146 ms

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

201 ms

OpenSans-Bold-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Bold-webfont.woff

196 ms

rondo.svg

rondo.svg

242 ms

collect

collect

29 ms

anchor

anchor

41 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

9 ms

s5G5viF55Zd620FDUE2o6cwnsrT1pToaK6kVmkloWvE.js

s5G5viF55Zd620FDUE2o6cwnsrT1pToaK6kVmkloWvE.js

16 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

37 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

35 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

58 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

59 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

6 ms

collect

collect

11 ms

Accessibility Review

clickclaims.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

clickclaims.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

clickclaims.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clickclaims.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Clickclaims.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

clickclaims.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Click Claims. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: