4.6 sec in total
416 ms
2.9 sec
1.2 sec
Welcome to clicks-persecond.com homepage info - get ready to check Clicks Per Second best content right away, or after learning these important things about clicks-persecond.com
Best CPS Tester to find how many clicks a gamer can do in seconds and minutes. Play gamers like pro after getting your CPS Test done here.
Visit clicks-persecond.comWe analyzed Clicks-persecond.com page load time and found that the first response time was 416 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
clicks-persecond.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value3.9 s
53/100
25%
Value4.2 s
77/100
10%
Value1,310 ms
18/100
30%
Value0.589
11/100
15%
Value8.1 s
41/100
10%
416 ms
36 ms
305 ms
309 ms
310 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Clicks-persecond.com, 34% (28 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 12% (10 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Clicks-persecond.com.
Page size can be reduced by 540.9 kB (61%)
892.7 kB
351.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Clicks-persecond.com main page is 892.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 588.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 206.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 206.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 334.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 334.0 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 372 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clicks-persecond.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (70%)
50
15
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clicks Per Second. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
clicks-persecond.com
416 ms
css
36 ms
main.min.css
305 ms
menu-animation.min.css
309 ms
style.min.css
310 ms
adsbygoogle.js
115 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
295 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
31 ms
widget-posts.min.css
353 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
441 ms
post-1934.css
548 ms
post-1403.css
607 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
607 ms
post-10.css
608 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
352 ms
global.css
608 ms
animations.min.css
778 ms
fontawesome.min.css
1104 ms
solid.min.css
607 ms
frontend.min.js
1072 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1148 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
1148 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1103 ms
jquery.min.js
1322 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1326 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1479 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1406 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1148 ms
hooks.min.js
1406 ms
i18n.min.js
1408 ms
frontend.min.js
1325 ms
waypoints.min.js
1477 ms
core.min.js
1478 ms
frontend.min.js
1791 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
1405 ms
show_ads_impl.js
384 ms
zrt_lookup_nohtml.html
24 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
27 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
57 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
102 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
129 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
149 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
149 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf
47 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf
65 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf
65 ms
KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf
64 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf
66 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf
65 ms
ads
500 ms
ads
466 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
220 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
222 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
224 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
229 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
224 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
222 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
225 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
225 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
228 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-2Y-FV0Uw.ttf
228 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FV0Uw.ttf
228 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-h4-FV0Uw.ttf
230 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-ro-FV0Uw.ttf
231 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFV0Uw.ttf
232 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFV0Uw.ttf
232 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYiFV0Uw.ttf
233 ms
ads
220 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
370 ms
ads
359 ms
ads
252 ms
ads
414 ms
ads
226 ms
ads
115 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
290 ms
ads
86 ms
sodar
91 ms
fa-solid-900.svg
290 ms
sodar2.js
20 ms
runner.html
25 ms
aframe
58 ms
O8T1Km08OhS5_Tz58jKeajrFynp-IyfJlJwKv1268Sc.js
4 ms
clicks-persecond.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
clicks-persecond.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
clicks-persecond.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clicks-persecond.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Clicks-persecond.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
clicks-persecond.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: