18.6 sec in total
7.3 sec
11.1 sec
270 ms
Welcome to clience.com homepage info - get ready to check Clience best content right away, or after learning these important things about clience.com
Clience est une société de formation qui intervient dans le domaine du management, du développement personnel et de la performance des équipes.
Visit clience.comWe analyzed Clience.com page load time and found that the first response time was 7.3 sec and then it took 11.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
clience.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value10.6 s
0/100
25%
Value15.4 s
0/100
10%
Value4,430 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.06
98/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
7250 ms
189 ms
415 ms
325 ms
331 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Clience.com, 14% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Clience.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.5 MB (63%)
3.9 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Clience.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 1.7 MB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.7 MB or 93% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 172.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Clience needs image optimization as it can save up to 172.5 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 377.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 377.4 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 253.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clience.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 253.0 kB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (67%)
72
24
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clience. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
clience.com
7250 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
189 ms
jcarousel.css
415 ms
styles.css
325 ms
styles.css
331 ms
settings.css
493 ms
css
25 ms
css
36 ms
dynamic-style.php
2190 ms
style.css
329 ms
css
49 ms
css
47 ms
css
48 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1215 ms
superfish.css
1222 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
1238 ms
flexslider.css
1245 ms
responsive.css
780 ms
style.css
876 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.css
1239 ms
jquery.js
1423 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1339 ms
jcarousel.js
1391 ms
init.js
1394 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1435 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1474 ms
css
46 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1511 ms
scripts.js
1530 ms
counter.js
1555 ms
jquery.superfish.min.js
1528 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.min.js
1565 ms
retina.js
1600 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
1609 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.js
1625 ms
mCustomScrollbar.js
1660 ms
jquery.backstretch.min.js
1678 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
1691 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1700 ms
masonry.min.js
1742 ms
jquery.mobilemenu.js
1755 ms
custom.js
1775 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1789 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.js
1630 ms
jquery.easing.pack.js
1542 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
1581 ms
style.css
996 ms
responsive.css
1010 ms
superfish.css
1019 ms
flexslider.css
1085 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
1083 ms
gray_lines.png
192 ms
logo250.png
190 ms
logo500.png
189 ms
slider-1-bg.jpg
201 ms
methode-color9.png
644 ms
slider-2-bg.jpg
201 ms
manager.jpg
414 ms
slider-3-bg.jpg
219 ms
platform.png
1082 ms
slider-4-bg.jpg
282 ms
parachute.png
722 ms
Remplir-questionnaire.png
1406 ms
manager-un-projet-de-changement-1024x682.jpg
780 ms
logo-sage.jpg
478 ms
logo-barriere.jpg
572 ms
logo-cnrs.jpg
664 ms
logo-aiguillon.jpg
685 ms
logo-entremont.jpg
843 ms
logo-precom.jpg
768 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
22 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
23 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
23 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
23 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
22 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
128 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
22 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSi3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
128 ms
IgZJs4-7SA1XX_edsoXWog.ttf
23 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
22 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
128 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
23 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
837 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
765 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
757 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
818 ms
revicons.woff
110 ms
clience.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
clience.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
clience.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clience.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Clience.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
clience.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Clience. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: