2.7 sec in total
335 ms
2.3 sec
94 ms
Click here to check amazing Clienthistory content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about clienthistory.com
Visit clienthistory.comWe analyzed Clienthistory.com page load time and found that the first response time was 335 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
clienthistory.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
69/100
10%
Value3.0 s
79/100
25%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.235
53/100
15%
Value3.2 s
94/100
10%
335 ms
421 ms
171 ms
174 ms
505 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Clienthistory.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Js-agent.newrelic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Clienthistory.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (77%)
1.4 MB
333.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Clienthistory.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 957.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.4 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.2 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Clienthistory needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.3 kB or 48% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 718.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 718.3 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 356.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clienthistory.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 356.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (79%)
33
7
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clienthistory. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
index.php
335 ms
yui.css
421 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
171 ms
deprecated.css
174 ms
style.css
505 ms
sprites.css
488 ms
sprites.css
335 ms
sugar_grp1_jquery.js
933 ms
sugar_grp1_yui.js
1246 ms
sugar_grp1.js
822 ms
functions_cache.js
695 ms
calendar.js
655 ms
style.js
746 ms
login.css
854 ms
login.js
863 ms
jquery.ui.base.css
780 ms
jquery.ui.theme.css
865 ms
jquery.ui.core.css
153 ms
jquery.ui.accordion.css
168 ms
jquery.ui.autocomplete.css
172 ms
jquery.ui.button.css
194 ms
jquery.ui.datepicker.css
254 ms
jquery.ui.dialog.css
321 ms
jquery.ui.progressbar.css
309 ms
jquery.ui.resizable.css
360 ms
jquery.ui.selectable.css
363 ms
jquery.ui.slider.css
422 ms
jquery.ui.tabs.css
489 ms
index.php
91 ms
sugar_md.png
86 ms
advanced_search.gif
142 ms
company_logo.png
178 ms
index.php
194 ms
nr-852.min.js
46 ms
clienthistory.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
clienthistory.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
clienthistory.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clienthistory.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Clienthistory.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
clienthistory.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Clienthistory. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: