Tools & Wizards About Us
clientica.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

clientica.org

Reliable WordPress Maintenance, Management Services | Clientica

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

300 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

979 ms

clientica.org screenshot

About Website

Visit clientica.org now to see the best up-to-date Clientica content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about clientica.org

WordPress Management Services including web development. virus removal, customization services, and support management to improve and adjust the existing site.

Visit clientica.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Clientica.org page load time and found that the first response time was 300 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

clientica.org performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

39/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

47/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value290 ms

79/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.138

79/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

clientica.org

300 ms

nm-js_composer.css

60 ms

style.min.css

119 ms

vendors-style.css

172 ms

style.css

229 ms

Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (93 requests) were addressed to the original Clientica.org, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (544 ms) belongs to the original domain Clientica.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 204.5 kB (9%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Clientica.org main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 121.4 kB

  • Original 150.0 kB
  • After minification 146.6 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 121.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 44.5 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Clientica images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 228.5 kB
  • After minification 228.5 kB
  • After compression 225.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 35.4 kB

  • Original 138.8 kB
  • After minification 123.3 kB
  • After compression 103.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clientica.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.4 kB or 25% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (60%)

Requests Now

92

After Optimization

37

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clientica. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

clientica.org

clientica.org

300 ms

nm-js_composer.css

nm-js_composer.css

60 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

119 ms

vendors-style.css

vendors-style.css

172 ms

style.css

style.css

229 ms

payoneer-payment-gateway.css

payoneer-payment-gateway.css

172 ms

css.css

css.css

174 ms

css.css

css.css

173 ms

photoswipe.min.css

photoswipe.min.css

175 ms

default-skin.min.css

default-skin.min.css

237 ms

css.css

css.css

239 ms

css.min.css

css.min.css

291 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

239 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

241 ms

normalize.min.css

normalize.min.css

284 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

287 ms

slick-theme.min.css

slick-theme.min.css

288 ms

magnific-popup.min.css

magnific-popup.min.css

287 ms

grid.css

grid.css

293 ms

selectod.min.css

selectod.min.css

341 ms

shop.css

shop.css

411 ms

theme-icons.min.css

theme-icons.min.css

345 ms

style.css

style.css

404 ms

elements.css

elements.css

347 ms

nm-portfolio.css

nm-portfolio.css

347 ms

css

css

25 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

455 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

402 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

406 ms

nm-js_composer_front.min.js

nm-js_composer_front.min.js

406 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

541 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

541 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

543 ms

index.js

index.js

542 ms

js.js

js.js

541 ms

js.js

js.js

543 ms

photoswipe.min.js

photoswipe.min.js

544 ms

photoswipe-ui-default.min.js

photoswipe-ui-default.min.js

544 ms

js.js

js.js

493 ms

js.min.js

js.min.js

493 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

440 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

441 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

440 ms

add-to-cart-variation.min.js

add-to-cart-variation.min.js

440 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

481 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

406 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

403 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

414 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

413 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

422 ms

cart-fragments.min.js

cart-fragments.min.js

414 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

412 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

482 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

475 ms

nm-core.min.js

nm-core.min.js

476 ms

nm-blog.min.js

nm-blog.min.js

476 ms

nm-shop-search.min.js

nm-shop-search.min.js

429 ms

nm-accordions-tabs.min.js

nm-accordions-tabs.min.js

426 ms

logo-clientica-eng.png

logo-clientica-eng.png

278 ms

migration.png

migration.png

278 ms

maintenance.png

maintenance.png

279 ms

mini.png

mini.png

279 ms

virus-removal.png

virus-removal.png

391 ms

devices.png

devices.png

391 ms

header_banner_22.jpg

header_banner_22.jpg

433 ms

header_banner_11.jpg

header_banner_11.jpg

344 ms

website-development.jpg

website-development.jpg

344 ms

maintenance-package.jpg

maintenance-package.jpg

343 ms

zoe.jpg

zoe.jpg

430 ms

lissa.jpg

lissa.jpg

428 ms

dentalmed.jpg

dentalmed.jpg

496 ms

mrfix.jpg

mrfix.jpg

441 ms

mrfix-1.jpg

mrfix-1.jpg

385 ms

website2.jpg

website2.jpg

495 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

57 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

59 ms

nm-font.ttf

nm-font.ttf

444 ms

lissa2.jpg

lissa2.jpg

426 ms

ws2.jpg

ws2.jpg

425 ms

ws3.jpg

ws3.jpg

436 ms

lissa3.jpg

lissa3.jpg

433 ms

lissa1.jpg

lissa1.jpg

457 ms

dm3.jpg

dm3.jpg

455 ms

b2.png

b2.png

458 ms

b3.png

b3.png

450 ms

b4.png

b4.png

445 ms

b5.png

b5.png

450 ms

b6.png

b6.png

472 ms

b7-1.png

b7-1.png

455 ms

TEAM-01.jpg

TEAM-01.jpg

395 ms

TEAM-02.jpg

TEAM-02.jpg

397 ms

TEAM-03.jpg

TEAM-03.jpg

398 ms

TEAM-08.jpg

TEAM-08.jpg

401 ms

TEAM-05.jpg

TEAM-05.jpg

442 ms

TEAM-04.jpg

TEAM-04.jpg

440 ms

TEAM-07.jpg

TEAM-07.jpg

447 ms

Accessibility Review

clientica.org accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

clientica.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

clientica.org SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clientica.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Clientica.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

clientica.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Clientica. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: