Tools & Wizards About Us
clientprotectiongroup.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

clientprotectiongroup.com

Timeshare Attorneys - Timeshare Elimination by Client Protection Group

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

490 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

64 ms

clientprotectiongroup.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Client Protection Group content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about clientprotectiongroup.com

Get help from expert timeshare attorneys at Client Protection Group. Cancel your timeshare contract legally. Contact us for a free consultation.

Visit clientprotectiongroup.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Clientprotectiongroup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 490 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

clientprotectiongroup.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

32/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value860 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.017

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.8 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.clientprotectiongroup.com

490 ms

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

38 ms

minified.js

48 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

41 ms

polyfill.min.js

520 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Clientprotectiongroup.com, 45% (26 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 26% (15 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (711 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 496.2 kB (51%)

Content Size

982.1 kB

After Optimization

485.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Clientprotectiongroup.com main page is 982.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 588.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 467.7 kB

  • Original 588.9 kB
  • After minification 587.3 kB
  • After compression 121.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 467.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 25.8 kB

  • Original 168.7 kB
  • After minification 142.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Client Protection Group needs image optimization as it can save up to 25.8 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 224.5 kB
  • After minification 224.5 kB
  • After compression 221.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (27%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

32

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Client Protection Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.clientprotectiongroup.com

www.clientprotectiongroup.com

490 ms

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

38 ms

minified.js

minified.js

48 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

41 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

520 ms

optimize.js

optimize.js

186 ms

thunderbolt-commons.eb770ee8.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.eb770ee8.bundle.min.js

36 ms

main.578f27a3.bundle.min.js

main.578f27a3.bundle.min.js

36 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

37 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

35 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

72 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

73 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

73 ms

6cf772_06686cb679c34c05b7f1f03d116afd75.png

6cf772_06686cb679c34c05b7f1f03d116afd75.png

348 ms

cpg-hmpg-hdr.jpg

cpg-hmpg-hdr.jpg

444 ms

Beach%20Deck.jpg

Beach%20Deck.jpg

349 ms

view.png

view.png

518 ms

communications.png

communications.png

385 ms

business.png

business.png

461 ms

11062b_8b22b23092f6424dbc6b99c880e11042~mv2.jpg

11062b_8b22b23092f6424dbc6b99c880e11042~mv2.jpg

440 ms

Better%20business%20bureau.png

Better%20business%20bureau.png

567 ms

great%20seal.png

great%20seal.png

687 ms

cpg-footer-hdr.jpg

cpg-footer-hdr.jpg

613 ms

CPG%20Logo%20Black%20copy%20shield.jpg

CPG%20Logo%20Black%20copy%20shield.jpg

656 ms

243d20_30a6df81bef2465b9ba11b513c8fb5e4~mv2.jpg

243d20_30a6df81bef2465b9ba11b513c8fb5e4~mv2.jpg

529 ms

243d20_63a5560e8e1646f1a051be96451f3c33~mv2.jpg

243d20_63a5560e8e1646f1a051be96451f3c33~mv2.jpg

577 ms

243d20_3b95572bd2624c79af5180771a359627~mv2.jpg

243d20_3b95572bd2624c79af5180771a359627~mv2.jpg

638 ms

243d20_e7ea5fb630fa4b63b667b7f1b8ba68f9~mv2.jpg

243d20_e7ea5fb630fa4b63b667b7f1b8ba68f9~mv2.jpg

711 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

150 ms

61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff

61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff

27 ms

c5749443-93da-4592-b794-42f28d62ef72.woff

c5749443-93da-4592-b794-42f28d62ef72.woff

27 ms

4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff

4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff

26 ms

b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff

b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff

27 ms

6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff

6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff

14 ms

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

27 ms

bc176270-17fa-4c78-a343-9fe52824e501.woff

bc176270-17fa-4c78-a343-9fe52824e501.woff

56 ms

07d62b21-8d7a-4c36-be86-d32ab1089972.woff

07d62b21-8d7a-4c36-be86-d32ab1089972.woff

57 ms

a9e95a29-98a7-404a-90ee-1929ad09c696.woff

a9e95a29-98a7-404a-90ee-1929ad09c696.woff

57 ms

e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff

e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff

57 ms

cca525a8-ad89-43ae-aced-bcb49fb271dc.woff

cca525a8-ad89-43ae-aced-bcb49fb271dc.woff

57 ms

aDjpMND83pDErGXlVEr-SRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

aDjpMND83pDErGXlVEr-SRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

57 ms

9VWMTeb5jtXkNoTv949NpRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

9VWMTeb5jtXkNoTv949NpRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

58 ms

154 ms

154 ms

154 ms

141 ms

157 ms

145 ms

186 ms

185 ms

182 ms

199 ms

198 ms

192 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

6 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

22 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

11 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

9 ms

Accessibility Review

clientprotectiongroup.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

clientprotectiongroup.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

clientprotectiongroup.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clientprotectiongroup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Clientprotectiongroup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

clientprotectiongroup.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Client Protection Group. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: