Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

climateprotection.org

88MEGA # Situs Slot Penuh Keberuntungan Mudah Menang Tiap Hari

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

77 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

82 ms

climateprotection.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Climateprotection content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about climateprotection.org

88MEGA adalah situs slot online gacor yang penuh dengan keberuntungan pemain mudah menang tiap hari. Pecahan hingga putaran slot terbaik dan tercantik.

Visit climateprotection.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Climateprotection.org page load time and found that the first response time was 77 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

climateprotection.org performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

49/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.1 s

86/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

climateprotection.org

77 ms

erbthaigr.com

911 ms

v0.js

22 ms

css2

36 ms

css2

79 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Climateprotection.org, 36% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 27% (3 requests) were made to M-g.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (911 ms) relates to the external source Erbthaigr.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 38.6 kB (29%)

Content Size

133.7 kB

After Optimization

95.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Climateprotection.org main page is 133.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 86.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 38.6 kB

  • Original 47.7 kB
  • After minification 43.8 kB
  • After compression 9.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 86.0 kB
  • After minification 86.0 kB
  • After compression 86.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (50%)

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

3

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Climateprotection. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

climateprotection.org accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

climateprotection.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

climateprotection.org SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ID

  • Language Claimed

    ID

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Climateprotection.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Climateprotection.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Climateprotection. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: