3.1 sec in total
118 ms
2.3 sec
642 ms
Welcome to clinvigilant.com homepage info - get ready to check Clin Vigilant best content right away, or after learning these important things about clinvigilant.com
Global Clinical Trial Solutions Provider to accelerate your clinical trial with our in-house digital solution, clinical trial services and consulting
Visit clinvigilant.comWe analyzed Clinvigilant.com page load time and found that the first response time was 118 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
clinvigilant.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value13.7 s
0/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value2,460 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.049
99/100
15%
Value13.8 s
10/100
10%
118 ms
63 ms
110 ms
196 ms
81 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Clinvigilant.com, 18% (17 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (614 ms) belongs to the original domain Clinvigilant.com.
Page size can be reduced by 430.5 kB (36%)
1.2 MB
758.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Clinvigilant.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 432.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 142.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 142.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Clin Vigilant images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 285.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clinvigilant.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 285.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (81%)
77
15
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clin Vigilant. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.clinvigilant.com
118 ms
cookie-law-info-public.css
63 ms
cookie-law-info-gdpr.css
110 ms
general.min.css
196 ms
style.min.css
81 ms
wpforms-full.min.css
104 ms
style.min.css
48 ms
theme.min.css
111 ms
header-footer.min.css
118 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
140 ms
post-427.css
158 ms
frontend.min.css
169 ms
swiper.min.css
155 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
170 ms
all.min.css
210 ms
v4-shims.min.css
217 ms
post-55.css
204 ms
post-7610.css
227 ms
post-8236.css
241 ms
general.min.css
426 ms
css
60 ms
jquery.min.js
269 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
362 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
327 ms
cookie-law-info-ccpa.js
283 ms
v4-shims.min.js
284 ms
js
150 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
325 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
323 ms
email-decode.min.js
286 ms
cookie-law-info-table.css
340 ms
script.min.js
371 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
411 ms
general.min.js
405 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
395 ms
jquery-numerator.min.js
403 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
614 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
614 ms
api.js
67 ms
v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317
114 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
614 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
575 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
563 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
543 ms
hooks.min.js
518 ms
i18n.min.js
517 ms
frontend.min.js
514 ms
waypoints.min.js
507 ms
core.min.js
484 ms
frontend.min.js
472 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
469 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
459 ms
underscore.min.js
458 ms
wp-util.min.js
433 ms
frontend.min.js
421 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
417 ms
mailcheck.min.js
412 ms
punycode.min.js
403 ms
utils.min.js
390 ms
wpforms.min.js
363 ms
ClinVigilant-logo.png
128 ms
Clinical-Trial-Excellence.png
261 ms
005-genetics.png
262 ms
004-medical-history.png
264 ms
003-data-collection.png
263 ms
002-analytics.png
372 ms
006-system.png
264 ms
001-writing.png
265 ms
007-blockchain.png
266 ms
008-cell.png
309 ms
submit-spin.svg
269 ms
logo-cookieyes.svg
266 ms
js
91 ms
146 ms
1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexZNR8aevHg.ttf
113 ms
1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexaFR8aevHg.ttf
130 ms
1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexc1R8aevHg.ttf
169 ms
1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexRNR8aevHg.ttf
190 ms
1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexU1W8aevHg.ttf
187 ms
1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexXRW8aevHg.ttf
190 ms
1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexRNW8aevHg.ttf
190 ms
1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexTpW8aevHg.ttf
188 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjovoSmb2Rm.ttf
186 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf
191 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2Rm.ttf
189 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoDISmb2Rm.ttf
193 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojIWmb2Rm.ttf
193 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoUoOmb2Rm.ttf
191 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2Rm.ttf
282 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoDIOmb2Rm.ttf
280 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoJYOmb2Rm.ttf
282 ms
api.min.js
137 ms
recaptcha__en.js
110 ms
main.js
178 ms
31 ms
clinvigilant.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
clinvigilant.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
clinvigilant.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clinvigilant.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Clinvigilant.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
clinvigilant.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Clin Vigilant. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: