Tools & Wizards About Us
clippercreek.us screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

clippercreek.us

ClipperCreek | Enphase

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

13 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

350 ms

clippercreek.us screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Clipper Creek content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about clippercreek.us

Visit clippercreek.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Clippercreek.us page load time and found that the first response time was 13 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

clippercreek.us performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,290 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

clippercreek.us

13 ms

clippercreek

75 ms

clippercreek

95 ms

css_sl7QUD1H8m-3-HmAxYnsPVDgLlc-msHkQ9qf52aVYeE.css

7 ms

css_vl7xngEj8bM5G1uq6FS7KVDxV6ncDuqRdCJcKGBLmoI.css

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Clippercreek.us, 68% (25 requests) were made to Enphase.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Assets.sitescdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (244 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 164.3 kB (18%)

Content Size

888.1 kB

After Optimization

723.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Clippercreek.us main page is 888.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 399.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 123.8 kB

  • Original 156.0 kB
  • After minification 138.9 kB
  • After compression 32.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.1 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 123.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 399.1 kB
  • After minification 394.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Clipper Creek images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 20.7 kB

  • Original 271.7 kB
  • After minification 271.7 kB
  • After compression 251.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 15.5 kB

  • Original 61.3 kB
  • After minification 61.3 kB
  • After compression 45.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clippercreek.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.5 kB or 25% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (44%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clipper Creek. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

clippercreek.us

clippercreek.us

13 ms

clippercreek

clippercreek

75 ms

clippercreek

clippercreek

95 ms

css_sl7QUD1H8m-3-HmAxYnsPVDgLlc-msHkQ9qf52aVYeE.css

css_sl7QUD1H8m-3-HmAxYnsPVDgLlc-msHkQ9qf52aVYeE.css

7 ms

css_vl7xngEj8bM5G1uq6FS7KVDxV6ncDuqRdCJcKGBLmoI.css

css_vl7xngEj8bM5G1uq6FS7KVDxV6ncDuqRdCJcKGBLmoI.css

45 ms

5fd22b8ab87b4851ffbc7d6c.js

5fd22b8ab87b4851ffbc7d6c.js

124 ms

g4dln637.js

g4dln637.js

69 ms

js_vMcB7b81NzRL0ERJ6SlLdIzmhzPe_zU3w5_Zkcsd9Iw.js

js_vMcB7b81NzRL0ERJ6SlLdIzmhzPe_zU3w5_Zkcsd9Iw.js

37 ms

answers.css

answers.css

36 ms

answerstemplates.compiled.min.js

answerstemplates.compiled.min.js

57 ms

answers.min.js

answers.min.js

67 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

7 ms

secure-privacy-v1.js

secure-privacy-v1.js

73 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

244 ms

A4102987-73f2-43b3-9ea1-492962c3df8c1.js

A4102987-73f2-43b3-9ea1-492962c3df8c1.js

98 ms

dismiss.svg

dismiss.svg

70 ms

spritemap.svg

spritemap.svg

68 ms

logo-white.svg

logo-white.svg

54 ms

store--white.svg

store--white.svg

55 ms

store.svg

store.svg

54 ms

B_0004_INT_D_Garage-4batteries.jpg

B_0004_INT_D_Garage-4batteries.jpg

55 ms

B_xxxx_INT_M_TEMPLATE.jpg

B_xxxx_INT_M_TEMPLATE.jpg

52 ms

afxxox0fgv-3Dhouse%20Isometric_Textured_IQ5P_US.jpg

afxxox0fgv-3Dhouse%20Isometric_Textured_IQ5P_US.jpg

149 ms

c1ggo3ag30-first_mobile_frame_EN-US.jpg

c1ggo3ag30-first_mobile_frame_EN-US.jpg

149 ms

HCS_40_Hardwired_Hero.png

HCS_40_Hardwired_Hero.png

162 ms

HCS_50_Hardwired_Hero.png

HCS_50_Hardwired_Hero.png

62 ms

HCS_80_Hardwired_Hero.png

HCS_80_Hardwired_Hero.png

60 ms

HCS-D40PR_hero_1.png

HCS-D40PR_hero_1.png

149 ms

g4dln637.json

g4dln637.json

160 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

130 ms

css_sl7QUD1H8m-3-HmAxYnsPVDgLlc-msHkQ9qf52aVYeE.css

css_sl7QUD1H8m-3-HmAxYnsPVDgLlc-msHkQ9qf52aVYeE.css

119 ms

css_vl7xngEj8bM5G1uq6FS7KVDxV6ncDuqRdCJcKGBLmoI.css

css_vl7xngEj8bM5G1uq6FS7KVDxV6ncDuqRdCJcKGBLmoI.css

122 ms

answers.css

answers.css

129 ms

afxxox0fgv-3Dhouse%20Isometric_Clay_IQ5P_US_start.jpg

afxxox0fgv-3Dhouse%20Isometric_Clay_IQ5P_US_start.jpg

71 ms

EnphaseVisuelt-Regular.woff

EnphaseVisuelt-Regular.woff

52 ms

EnphaseVisuelt-Medium.woff

EnphaseVisuelt-Medium.woff

53 ms

visitor

visitor

79 ms

Accessibility Review

clippercreek.us accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

clippercreek.us best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

clippercreek.us SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clippercreek.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Clippercreek.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

clippercreek.us

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Clipper Creek. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: