Tools & Wizards About Us
clippingservicestudio.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

clippingservicestudio.com

Clipping Path Service Provider | Photoshop Image Editing service

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

162 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

clippingservicestudio.com screenshot

About Website

Visit clippingservicestudio.com now to see the best up-to-date Clipping Service Studio content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about clippingservicestudio.com

We're clipping path service provider, we provide best quality clipping path service. We have professional photo editing expert team who are expert own profession area like as clipping path, backg...

Visit clippingservicestudio.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Clippingservicestudio.com page load time and found that the first response time was 162 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

clippingservicestudio.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.6 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value930 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.022

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.4 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

clippingservicestudio.com

162 ms

clippingservicestudio.com

1529 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

66 ms

style.min.css

132 ms

frontend.css

190 ms

Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (89 requests) were addressed to the original Clippingservicestudio.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Clippingservicestudio.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 230.6 kB (16%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Clippingservicestudio.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 539.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 138.5 kB

  • Original 162.7 kB
  • After minification 155.8 kB
  • After compression 24.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 138.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

  • Original 507.0 kB
  • After minification 501.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Clipping Service Studio images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 41.4 kB

  • Original 539.7 kB
  • After minification 539.7 kB
  • After compression 498.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 44.9 kB

  • Original 199.8 kB
  • After minification 199.8 kB
  • After compression 154.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clippingservicestudio.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.9 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (73%)

Requests Now

89

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clipping Service Studio. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

clippingservicestudio.com

clippingservicestudio.com

162 ms

clippingservicestudio.com

clippingservicestudio.com

1529 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

66 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

132 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

190 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

192 ms

styles.css

styles.css

192 ms

air-datepicker.min.css

air-datepicker.min.css

192 ms

simple-sticky-header-on-scroll.css

simple-sticky-header-on-scroll.css

193 ms

css

css

42 ms

header-footer-elementor.css

header-footer-elementor.css

195 ms

jet-elements.css

jet-elements.css

376 ms

jet-elements-skin.css

jet-elements-skin.css

255 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

257 ms

frontend-legacy.min.css

frontend-legacy.min.css

258 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

322 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

259 ms

post-1.css

post-1.css

320 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

509 ms

global.css

global.css

328 ms

post-14.css

post-14.css

326 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

384 ms

widget-areas.min.css

widget-areas.min.css

389 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

390 ms

post-43.css

post-43.css

391 ms

post-46.css

post-46.css

437 ms

css

css

39 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

448 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

453 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

451 ms

devtools-detect.js

devtools-detect.js

453 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

562 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

526 ms

air-datepicker.min.js

air-datepicker.min.js

527 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

525 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

525 ms

index.js

index.js

690 ms

index.js

index.js

691 ms

simple-sticky-header-on-scroll.js

simple-sticky-header-on-scroll.js

691 ms

api.js

api.js

44 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

691 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

638 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

569 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

513 ms

index.js

index.js

512 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

513 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

511 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

622 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

515 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

453 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

488 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

488 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

487 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

492 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

487 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

483 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

510 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

510 ms

share-link.min.js

share-link.min.js

504 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

501 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

501 ms

preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js

preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js

586 ms

jet-elements.min.js

jet-elements.min.js

537 ms

preloaded-modules.min.js

preloaded-modules.min.js

524 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

521 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

521 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

521 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

490 ms

support_80px.png

support_80px.png

126 ms

cropped-clipping-service-studio-Logo-2.png

cropped-clipping-service-studio-Logo-2.png

435 ms

clipping-path-services-company-css-graphice-media.jpg

clipping-path-services-company-css-graphice-media.jpg

520 ms

Hight-end-retouching-service-company-clipping-path-service.jpg

Hight-end-retouching-service-company-clipping-path-service.jpg

456 ms

jewelry-retouchi-service-Css-garphic-media-.jpg

jewelry-retouchi-service-Css-garphic-media-.jpg

521 ms

1224-410-banner-clippingservicestudio-1024x343.jpg

1224-410-banner-clippingservicestudio-1024x343.jpg

410 ms

Get-Your-Image-Edited-for-Free.jpg

Get-Your-Image-Edited-for-Free.jpg

453 ms

Css-garphic-media-1-1024x318.jpg

Css-garphic-media-1-1024x318.jpg

391 ms

clipping-path-clippingservicestudio.jpg

clipping-path-clippingservicestudio.jpg

450 ms

image-retouching-clippingservicestudio.jpg

image-retouching-clippingservicestudio.jpg

452 ms

image-masking-clippingservicestudio.jpg

image-masking-clippingservicestudio.jpg

471 ms

shadow-clippingservicestudio.jpg

shadow-clippingservicestudio.jpg

515 ms

Image-manipulation-clippingservicestudio.jpg

Image-manipulation-clippingservicestudio.jpg

513 ms

color-correction-clippingservicestudio.jpg

color-correction-clippingservicestudio.jpg

514 ms

photo-restoration-clippingservicestudio.jpg

photo-restoration-clippingservicestudio.jpg

515 ms

font

font

69 ms

font

font

106 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

696 ms

font

font

186 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

651 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

683 ms

background-remove-clippingservicestudio.jpg

background-remove-clippingservicestudio.jpg

534 ms

clippingservice-studio-css-garphic-media-1024x334.jpg

clippingservice-studio-css-garphic-media-1024x334.jpg

596 ms

css-graphic-media.buyear.jpg

css-graphic-media.buyear.jpg

535 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

121 ms

css-graphic-media-clints.jpg

css-graphic-media-clints.jpg

533 ms

483114-2.png

483114-2.png

588 ms

clipping-service-studio-Logo-2.png

clipping-service-studio-Logo-2.png

587 ms

clippingservicestudio.com

clippingservicestudio.com

892 ms

Accessibility Review

clippingservicestudio.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

clippingservicestudio.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

clippingservicestudio.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clippingservicestudio.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Clippingservicestudio.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

clippingservicestudio.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Clipping Service Studio. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: